Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. O'Leary expressed support for deferral to allow more time for colleagues and because he <br />opposes the Resolution and the memorandum of understanding. He explained his opposition, <br />stating that the work of public safety should be conducted by public forces accountable to the <br />public. He expressed doubt that officers of the Cleveland Clinic Police Department would <br />receive the same treatment as officers of the Lakewood Police Department in a situation <br />requiring discipline. He questioned the need for Cleveland Clinic to have its own private <br />police department and suggested that if there are true safety concerns about downtown that <br />they be addressed as a stand -alone issue. <br />Mr. Bullock provided examples of cases where on -site safety forces would be preferable such <br />as cases of trauma, drugs, and gun violence in the Cleveland Clinic ER. He asked Chief <br />Malley to explain if and how the MOU affects LPD officer staffing levels. <br />Chief Malley remarked that the MOU can be amended to address concerns about the <br />handling of officer misconduct. He noted that the Cleveland Clinic Police Department is <br />larger than the LPD and so Lakewood sees it as adding resources to the City's public safety <br />effort. He explained the Cleveland Clinic public safety staffing. Cleveland Clinic staffs its <br />facilities with sworn officers during its day shifts. As a result, LPD would not have to <br />respond to criminal activity issues during that time. During afternoon and evening shifts, <br />Cleveland Clinic hires off -duty LPD officers. If the MOU is not approved, Cleveland Clinic <br />would maintain security officers on duty 24/7 and they would have to make arrangements to <br />hire more off -duty Lakewood Police officers or Sheriffs to cover their day shifts. <br />Mr. Litten expressed support for the Resolution but is also agreeable to deferral to allow <br />colleagues more time. He asked for an explanation of any problems resulting from operating <br />without an MOU. <br />Director Butler explained that the original lease permits amendment by mutual agreement but <br />that that cannot go on indefinitely. <br />Mr. Anderson argued that because the Cleveland Clinic Police Department is subject to <br />subject to Ohio Sunshine Laws, due process laws, and public records requests that it is <br />basically a public police department. He asked Chief Malley how easy it is to have off duty <br />officers accept shifts at Cleveland Clinic. <br />Chief Malley responded that LPD does not do the scheduling for Cleveland Clinic. Off -duty <br />work is approved by the Chief of Police but not scheduled or managed by the Chief. If <br />Cleveland Clinic is unable to fill a shift with an LPD officer it is filled with a Cleveland <br />Clinic sworn officer. He explained the work performed by the sworn officers in the ER — <br />such as dealing with people coming in with contraband, drugs, or weapons, acting disorderly <br />or intoxicated. He stated that it is a benefit to LPD to have a Cleveland Clinic sworn officer <br />present to handle these situations so LPD does not have to take an officer off the road to <br />respond to these calls. <br />