My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MINUTES 03-05-18
Document-Host
>
City of Lakewood
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2018
>
MINUTES 03-05-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2019 8:33:51 AM
Creation date
7/23/2018 10:27:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Office Of Council
Document Type
Minutes
Date
3/5/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. O'Leary expressed support for deferral to allow more time for colleagues and because he <br />opposes the Resolution and the memorandum of understanding. He explained his opposition, <br />stating that the work of public safety should be conducted by public forces accountable to the <br />public. He expressed doubt that officers of the Cleveland Clinic Police Department would <br />receive the same treatment as officers of the Lakewood Police Department in a situation <br />requiring discipline. He questioned the need for Cleveland Clinic to have its own private <br />police department and suggested that if there are true safety concerns about downtown that <br />they be addressed as a stand -alone issue. <br />Mr. Bullock provided examples of cases where on -site safety forces would be preferable such <br />as cases of trauma, drugs, and gun violence in the Cleveland Clinic ER. He asked Chief <br />Malley to explain if and how the MOU affects LPD officer staffing levels. <br />Chief Malley remarked that the MOU can be amended to address concerns about the <br />handling of officer misconduct. He noted that the Cleveland Clinic Police Department is <br />larger than the LPD and so Lakewood sees it as adding resources to the City's public safety <br />effort. He explained the Cleveland Clinic public safety staffing. Cleveland Clinic staffs its <br />facilities with sworn officers during its day shifts. As a result, LPD would not have to <br />respond to criminal activity issues during that time. During afternoon and evening shifts, <br />Cleveland Clinic hires off -duty LPD officers. If the MOU is not approved, Cleveland Clinic <br />would maintain security officers on duty 24/7 and they would have to make arrangements to <br />hire more off -duty Lakewood Police officers or Sheriffs to cover their day shifts. <br />Mr. Litten expressed support for the Resolution but is also agreeable to deferral to allow <br />colleagues more time. He asked for an explanation of any problems resulting from operating <br />without an MOU. <br />Director Butler explained that the original lease permits amendment by mutual agreement but <br />that that cannot go on indefinitely. <br />Mr. Anderson argued that because the Cleveland Clinic Police Department is subject to <br />subject to Ohio Sunshine Laws, due process laws, and public records requests that it is <br />basically a public police department. He asked Chief Malley how easy it is to have off duty <br />officers accept shifts at Cleveland Clinic. <br />Chief Malley responded that LPD does not do the scheduling for Cleveland Clinic. Off -duty <br />work is approved by the Chief of Police but not scheduled or managed by the Chief. If <br />Cleveland Clinic is unable to fill a shift with an LPD officer it is filled with a Cleveland <br />Clinic sworn officer. He explained the work performed by the sworn officers in the ER — <br />such as dealing with people coming in with contraband, drugs, or weapons, acting disorderly <br />or intoxicated. He stated that it is a benefit to LPD to have a Cleveland Clinic sworn officer <br />present to handle these situations so LPD does not have to take an officer off the road to <br />respond to these calls. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.