Laserfiche WebLink
21. RESOLUTION 9060-19 - A RESOLUTION to take effect immediately provided it <br />receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of council, or <br />otherwise to take effect at the earliest period allowed by law, ratifying and endorsing the <br />City's Integrated Wet Weather Improvement Plan, and especially the Priorities and <br />Principles recited therein. (pg.28) <br />Council President O'Leary explained the city's need to get permits for the IWWIP plan to the <br />benefit of a children and younger members of the crowd. <br />Councilman Bullock asked questions regarding the IWWIP plan, specifically whether there <br />are some potential building code best practices that the city could adopt to adhere to the plan. <br />He also inquired whether the city could disseminate information to private property owners <br />in the meantime while waiting for plan approval, or is this something that would have to wait <br />until an arbitrary date in the future, such as 2029, to do such an effort. Special Counsel <br />McMahon stated that the city does not have to wait to involve private homeowners and that <br />the city will be getting data from a pilot study that was conducted in a Lakewood <br />neighborhood in order to make equitable policy on the matter. Councilman Bullock <br />commented that it sounds like the city has more analysis to do to figure out how to address <br />that. McMahon stated that the legal strength of the city's position is still in the process of <br />being determined. Congress has amended portions of the Clean Water Act and it has caused <br />the EPA to figure out new rules and Lakewood is being treated as a test guinea pig in this <br />instance. Council Bullock commented that it appears the city has done a lot of analysis that <br />will allow future councils and administrations to build on the foundation that has been laid. <br />McMahon stated that the alternative to the city's proposed plan is a consent decree that will <br />come from the federal government over 20-30 years that will not allow the degree of <br />flexibility that a permit provides with 5 year check -ins. <br />Councilman O'Malley asked if the city sees the Ohio EPA as the chief regulator on this <br />matter versus the federal EPA. McMahon stated that the hope is the Ohio EPA is the chief <br />regulator under the plan that the city has proposed, but it remains to be seen. Lakewood is <br />one of the few communities larger than 50,000 people that is not already under a federal <br />consent decree, which is more stringent and does not get us anywhere faster. O'Malley <br />asked, with the new governor and his administration, does the city see any change with how <br />the Ohio EPA addresses Lakewood's issues. McMahon stated that the new Ohio EPA <br />administrator has been on the job for 1 month, but comes from the same school of thought as <br />the previous director. The city is meeting with the Ohio EPA next week to request their <br />oversight. <br />All members voted in favor. Motion passed. Resolution 9060-19 adopted. <br />22. Communication from Mayor Summers regarding Mayoral appointment to the Planning <br />Commission. (pg.38) <br />0 <br />