Laserfiche WebLink
lead. Assistant Law Director Swallow has found a section of code that could enable <br />inspectors to make citations on the interior of a home. Casey Tobik spoke and shared a <br />personal experience regarding one of her children being affected by lead. This should be <br />viewed as a public health issue instead of a individual home repair issue. It was suggested <br />that a taskforce come together to combat the issue. The Health & Human Services <br />Committee is scheduled to meet again on April 8th to continue discussing the issue. <br />Discussion: Mr. Bullock stated that he spoke to the Lakewood Alive board about the lead <br />issue and believes they should be invited to the next committee meeting; Mr. Litten <br />confirmed he is in contact with Lakewood Alive in regard to the next meeting. Mayor <br />Summers added that the first applicant for the Lakewood Alive Pride fund is for a lead <br />remediation project. <br />Motion by Councilman Litten, seconded by Council President O'Leary to adopt receive <br />and file the report. <br />All members voting yea. Motion passed. <br />6. SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE 76 -18 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect at the earliest <br />period allowed by law, enacting Chapter 1727, Cigarette and Tobacco Vendors; Sales to <br />Persons Under 21, of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Lakewood in order to amend <br />and create regulations involving licensing for and sales of tobacco products. (Placed on <br />1 St reading and referred to HHS 12/17/18; 2nd reading 1/7/19) (pg. 4) <br />Public Comment: Mr. Tom Corrigan, attorney for Robusto & Briar premium tobacco <br />shop, spoke on the matter and provided and attached written statement. He stated his <br />client is grateful to the committee and will be following the law. He commends the <br />decriminalization component in the ordinance, but he cautioned Council to be careful <br />about delegating authority and to watch how the regulations are implemented. His client <br />hoped for a carve -out in ordinance for premium tobacco shops. He added that his client <br />was told local tobacco laws would not change until state's do; however his client realizes <br />that Council cannot be held to the word of past administrations or Councils. Lastly, Mr. <br />Corrigan proposed 3 amendments to the legislation for consideration: 1) top add a <br />definition for premium tobacco specialty store and make an exception for the age <br />restriction 2) adopt the definition of premium tobacco store and allow signage to remain <br />consistent with current federal regulations 3) to direct enforcement with the priority and <br />volume and frequency of underage sales with care not to unduly burden premium tobacco <br />stores. <br />Mr. Terry Allen of the Cuyahoga County Board of Health stated that there was great <br />dialogue in committee discussion of this law and that people are in favor of a Tobacco 21 <br />law. He added that 425 cities across the country and 22 states have all passed Tobacco 21 <br />laws. He was very active during the statewide smoking ban law that was comprehensive <br />across bars, restaurants, bingo halls, and all business that passed in 2006. Public support <br />