Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES OF THE HOUSING COMMITTEE <br />May 6, 2019 <br />East Conference Room <br />Present: <br />Councilmembers Anderson, O’Malley & Rader <br />Also Present: <br />Councilmembers Litten, Bullock, George, Law Director Butler, Building <br />Commissioner Joe Meyers, Assistant Building Commissioner Chris Parmalee <br />Call to Order: <br />7:02p.m. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 39-18-AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it <br />receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of Council, or <br />otherwise to take effect at the earliest period allowed by law, amending various <br />sections of Chapter 1306, Property Maintenance and Safety Code, of the Codified <br />Ordinances of the City ofLakewood in order to update the code so as to eliminate <br />ST <br />the threat of warrantless searches from the Code. (PLACED ON 1READING <br />nd <br />AND REFERRED TO HOUSING 9/4/18; 2reading 9/17/18; deferred 10/15/18) <br />Director Butler directed the Committee’s attention to the working draft provided. This version <br />was introduced in Committee in January. This version makes changes to the term “certificate of <br />occupancy” and essentially brings back point-of-sale inspections. <br />Building Department officials remarked on the department’s experience having point-of-sale <br />inspections suspended since October. The change has not resulted in a significant impact either <br />way. There has been no rise in complaints though some have requested the inspections. <br />Councilmember Anderson remindedthe Committee that the average number of violations during <br />an annual inspection is higher than the number of violations during a point-of-sale inspection. He <br />also reminded the Committee that the ordinance was introduced due to concerns about the <br />legality of point-of-sale inspections. <br />Director Butlerexplained that some of the communities targeted by legal action have abandoned <br />point-of-sale inspectionswhile others have beefed up the warrant language in their codes to <br />ensure that point-of-sale inspections abide by the Fourth Amendment moving forward. To be <br />lawful, a certificate of occupancy can not be contingent upon an inspection and other due process <br />safeguards must be put into place. <br />The working draft version of the ordinance borrows language from municipalities that have <br />strengthened their warrant language. Director Butler remarked that he and Chief Assistant Law <br />Director Swallow have discussed the list of warrant criteria in 1306.50 and decided that it is <br />sufficient and that there are risks to being too specific. He reminded the Committee that point-of- <br />sale inspections are only performed on non-owner-occupiedrentals. He dismissed the idea of <br />addingbank foreclosed properties to the list because these are usually not rental properties. He <br />suggested that the Committee address concerns about those properties with separate legislation. <br />1 <br /> <br />