minhous 07-22-19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chairman Anderson expressed concerns that many residents may think that the registered list is an endorsement of contractors and think they have been vetted by the city. Assistant Director Swallow asked questions regarding what the content of a contractor education program might look likeand posed the possibility that smaller contractors that are readily available to do work may run into issues with the amount of insurance the city requires. This proposed training may create another hurdle for them and deter them from doing business in the city. The timing of the orientation may also pose problems as well. Councilman Rader asked if the orientation was intended to be implemented by the city or a third party. Chairman Anderson stated that it seemed to be intended to be a controlled process in house by the city, such as making a packet available to contractors and the contractors then showing some sort of competency for the contents of the packet or doing business in Lakewood. Councilman Bullock added that the concept behind the legislation is that Lakewood has shifted into a growth mode that comes with challenges. As Lakewood has had home price increases consecutively for 4 years, contractors are going to continue to do work on homes, and Bullock stated that the city should want to make sure their doing good work and make sure that people are buying a good product. He stated that contracting is a less regulated and less uniform profession and the city ought to show leadership and crack down on the bad actors out there. This legislation was intended to follow the success of the landlord training, which is required nd once every 2year. He proposed a quarterly training that would facilitate engagement of contractors in a positive way and as a way to catch underperforming, bad actors. Councilman O’Malley expressed concern that it would deter a significant number of contractors in the city. He added that the landlord training is not analogous, as it is worth someone’s while due to the steady stream of business that comes with being a landlord. This reality is not the same for contractors who may work in the city infrequently. Chairman Anderson stated he’s heard from landlords and contractors that they are not afraid to go through an extra step if it provides some sort of competitive advantage form them. He provided examples of contractors reporting on each other for not pulling permits for work. The administration expressed concerns about whether putting them through a program would actually make them a better contractor. Councilman Bullock stated that the questions posed by Commissioner Meyers have the tone that he does not approve of the legislation and added that the legislation is not intended to be punitive. Commissioner Meyers replied that the Building Department is not a trade schooland that his department cannot education contractors in their trade, nor should it be putting tests together to train people. The Building Department enforces code and that code is a minimal standard.Members of the committee expressed concern that homeownersmay not be familiar with good contracting practices or construction. Commissioner Meyers stated that it would be worth educating the homeowners, not contractors, as they are ultimately the project managers. The Building Department only does point in time inspections. It was discussed that the Building Department being the enforcement contact in the ordinance may present a conflict of interest. Councilman Bullock stated that the landlord training is run by multiple city departments and that the city should have a collective effort to get the attention of contractors. Chairman Anderson stated that there are far fewer contractors operating in Lakewood than the number of landlords and homeowners and that there’s a need for the city to be cognizant of not creating a training program. He expressed a desire to make sure folks are competent and working