My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
minhous 12-2-19
Document-Host
>
City of Lakewood
>
Committee Minutes
>
2019
>
Housing
>
minhous 12-2-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2020 10:12:28 AM
Creation date
3/11/2020 10:12:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Office Of Council
Document Type
Housing
Date
12/2/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Councilmembers inquired as to what other communities have implemented a citywide CRA. <br />Director Sylvester indicated that Lakewood is charting new territory in the Cleveland-Akron area <br />with this move, however Cleveland is in the process of moving forward with the model. The <br />focus is on providing affordable housing to those make 80% - 120% of the local area median <br />income (AMI). It is the most pressurized range of all income spectrums no matter the city, <br />however in Lakewood the range is even more highly pressurized. In discussions with <br />counterparts in Columbus, the Planning Department found that they have reworked their CRA, <br />as many of the incentives under their old structure were only going into the already successful <br />Short North neighborhood. Columbus is expanding CRA areas to target certain areas and is in <br />the process of tightening up their policies and procedures to manage the expansion into areas of <br />need.Seattle implemented a citywide CRA in 2014, but did not have tight enough controls <br />initially, which required them to go back and rework their process. <br />Councilmembers and Director Sylvester ran through a hypothetical scenario with actual numbers <br />presented in a Planning Department PowerPoint presentation.The presentation detailed FY2019 <br />HUDincome limits and used the Barry Buick as an example. After calculations were made, it <br />was determined that 28 of the 140 units in the project would be rented to individuals in the 80% - <br />120% AMI range for a 15-year period. Combining this figure with potential affordable units in <br />the One Lakewood Place and Spitzer projectsgives Lakewood the potential to add under 100 <br />units between the 3 projects. It should be noted that participating in this program is optional for <br />developers. It should also be noted that land value taxes would increase despite any unit <br />abatements taking place due to the costs of construction improvements on a site. For example, <br />the Buick project has an estimated construction cost of 30 million dollars, which will drive the <br />land value up to approximately 1.3 million dollars. If a city’s market continues to thrive, it can <br />pick on land value over time despite abatements being in place. <br />It was noted that a developer participating in the CRA program has high penalties in the event he <br />or she do not comply with the terms of the affordable housing component of the deal. There are <br />15 years of restrictions on properties. The Solove team, who is doing work in Lakewood, has <br />delivered affordable workforce housing in Columbus. It was clarified that a city can have direct <br />control that a certain number of units are affordable in a project. Councilmembers and Planning <br />Department officials talked about the benefits of integrating these units into development <br />projects and how Lakewood’s convenient layout and access to good grocery stores and walkable <br />places leads to higher quality of life.It was also noted that this CRA arrangement allows <br />multiple government entities to share in the burden and risk, as opposed to the city being the only <br />investor in projects. <br />Chairman Anderson made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Rader to recommend <br />Resolution 2019-08 to full Council for passage. <br />Chairman Anderson highlighted past positive efforts that the city had to work with a private <br />entity in the development of a school building on West Clifton. He also noted that this move to <br />adjust the CRA positions Lakewood to compete with Cleveland’s efforts to incentivize <br />downtown living. <br />All members voted in favor of the motion. Motion passed. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.