Laserfiche WebLink
4. Health& Human Services Committee report regarding meeting held March 16, 2020. (to <br /> be provided) <br /> President O'Malley made a motion, seconded by Vice President Litten to defer. <br /> All members voted in favor. Motion passed. The report was deferred. <br /> ****NEW BUSINESS**** <br /> 5. Communication from President O'Malley regarding National League of Cities conference. <br /> (pg. 3) <br /> President O'Malley made a motion, seconded by Vice President Litten to receive and file the <br /> communication. <br /> All members voted in favor. Motion passed. The communication was received and filed. <br /> 6. Communication from Councilmember Kepple and President O'Malley regarding <br /> emergency meeting cancellations and changes. (pg. 4) <br /> President O'Malley made a motion, seconded by Vice President Litten to receive and file the <br /> communication. <br /> Discussion: Councilmember Bullock sought clarification that the intent of the ordinance was <br /> not to make changes to meeting laws routine rather than the exception, for instance only <br /> when there are declared emergencies. Councilmember Kepple stated that limiting public <br /> interaction via virtual means would only be under an emergency. She also added that it gives <br /> Council the ability to follow a regular procedural vote to cancel meetings in the future. <br /> Councilmember Bullock expressed hesitancy to limit public involvement in meetings and to <br /> conduct them online. President O'Malley shared similar feelings but also expressed his view <br /> that Council has an overriding duty to protect the public health by limiting gatherings at <br /> meetings during the ongoing crisis. President O'Malley and Director Corrigan clarified that <br /> Council has the authority to make the change to the city code based on Ohio's Sunshine <br /> Laws. Director Corrigan noted that the Law Department had several conversations with the <br /> Ohio Attorney General who loosened public meetings law requirements during this time of <br /> crisis. Councilmember Neff noted that the Office of the Attorney General has offered to join <br /> as an amicus on behalf of the municipality if a city were to be sued for a violation of the <br /> Open Meetings Act at this time. It was clarified that a meeting has to be live streamed and <br /> available at the time it is occurring in order to comply with public records law. Mayor <br /> George further clarified that this ordinance is only necessary when a state of emergency has <br /> been called. Councilmember Bullock sought to further define the term "streaming" in the <br /> legislation to include two-way communication that enables the public to ask questions. <br />