Laserfiche WebLink
less affluent circles. She expressed hesitancy to put undue stress on the Law Department or <br /> anyone else, noting that the Board of Elections provides a sound system of reporting. She also <br /> pointed out that the ordinance does not contain any limits on donations from PACs. <br /> Councilmember Shachner suggested that the ordinance speaks to the issue of people not trusting <br /> their government. He suggested that a more straightforward solution would be to require <br /> candidates to file campaign finance reports earlier and more often so that the public is aware of a <br /> candidate's donors before the end of the election. He stated that this will achieve accountability <br /> and provide knowledge to voters. He also pointed out that the proposed ordinance does not <br /> permit a candidate to self-fund a campaign. He stated that the ordinance as written has a burden <br /> of compliance that is high. <br /> Chairman Bullock expressed agreement with a donation limit schedule that mirrors the federal <br /> code and to use the Board of Elections to enforce the ordinance. He acknowledged that <br /> transparency has improved since the Board of Elections started posting campaign finance reports <br /> online but that because of the deadlines, the public is unaware of some donors until after the <br /> election. <br /> Councilmember Rader stated that the donation limits should not be higher than the federal limits. <br /> Councilmember Kepple expressed support for Councilmember Shachner's idea of changing the <br /> deadlines of the campaign finance reports. Chairman Bullock did as well. <br /> Law Direction Corrigan expressed doubt that the ordinance will achieve its intended results, <br /> noting that large donors are the exception in Lakewood politics. He expressed concern that an <br /> unintended consequence may be that it provides advantages to incumbents with large campaign <br /> "war chests." He noted that Cleveland restricts campaign donations from employees to $100. <br /> Acting Finance Director Shuster expressed concerns about how the proposed tax credit would be <br /> audited. It would also require changes to the tax software. <br /> Councilmember Kepple noted that the state tax credit for political donations is repealed starting <br /> in 2020. <br /> Director Corrigan expressed additional concerns about the Law Department's role in enforcing <br /> the ordinance. He stated that because he works for Council and the Mayor that fining them <br /> would be a conflict of interest. In response to a question, he clarified that the state cannot enforce <br /> the ordinance because it only enforces state law. <br /> In conclusion, Councilmember Rader stated that the ordinance is an attempt to make sure that all <br /> candidates have a fair shot and to limit the impact of large last-minute donations. <br /> Chairman Bullock summarized that today's discussion included a range of philosophical views <br /> on the issue and its mechanics. He stated that the committee will reconvene after several weeks <br /> or months once revisions are made. <br /> 2 <br />