My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
housmin 05-19-20
Document-Host
>
City of Lakewood
>
Committee Minutes
>
2020
>
Housing
>
housmin 05-19-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2020 5:22:08 PM
Creation date
6/5/2020 5:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Office Of Council
Document Type
Housing
Date
5/19/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Director Milius stated that the 30-seat maximum addition outlined in the legislation is a good <br /> starting point. The Planning Department also considered a max of 50% of the tables inside a <br /> restaurant for outdoor seating to maintain 6-foot social distancing guidelines. She also noted the <br /> need to take into consideration the impact outdoor dining might have on residential <br /> neighborhoods. She shared that the city has received applications to expand into parking lots of <br /> businesses, highlighting the safety benefits of the requests. It was stated that the city's <br /> requirement of$5 million in liability insurance coverage has been prohibitive to sidewalk cafe <br /> tables. The city has expressed willingness to allow just$1 million in liability insurance as part of <br /> this legislation. The cost of parklets was noted as potentially prohibitive, as the cost of the <br /> physical structure is in the $15,000 to $20,000 range. The fees associated with buying the <br /> parking space for parklets are high as well. <br /> Chairman Shachner stated that he trusts business owners to not overextend themselves and that <br /> he is reticent to handcuff the Planning Commission if an owner is able to come up with a creative <br /> solution. <br /> Councilmember Kepple proposed adding the need for a defined barrier only for safety or in <br /> compliance with current law in Section 5 of the resolution. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the $2.5 million liability insurance cap proposed in the legislation. <br /> The city has considered lowering the liability insurance requirement if a business is not serving <br /> alcohol. There were concerns expressed about equity, as business that already have outdoor <br /> dining have already purchased the $5 million policy that the city requires. It was noted that <br /> businesses that apply through the new process outlined in the legislation only benefit from it on a <br /> temporary basis. <br /> Assistant Director Swallow gave an overview of the conditional use permitting process renewal <br /> and how it might typically differ from the new proposed one under this legislation. She also <br /> added the importance of businesses having adequate insurance coverage and indemnifying the <br /> city to protect taxpayer dollars in the instance of a lawsuit. Reservations were expressed about <br /> not legislating a dollar amount of insurance required. <br /> Compromise was struck between the committee and the administration to allow for a $1 million <br /> liability policy for businesses not serving alcohol and providing sidewalk dining. <br /> Director Milius noted that based on the research she has done, alcohol has traditionally not been <br /> allowed in parklets. Contiguous outdoor dining has been the provision that allows the service of <br /> alcohol outdoors. <br /> Councilmember Rader questioned why the legislation is a resolution as opposed to an ordinance. <br /> Assistant Director Swallow indicated that the intent is not to codify the changes yet, and provide <br /> a temporary boost to businesses. <br /> The committee discussed procedure on making amendments to the legislation and the need for a <br /> special council meeting later in the week for the passage of the resolution. It was noted that the <br /> legislation would need to be referred to Planning Commission for review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.