MIN 05-21-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In response to concerns raised by Commissioner Meyers, the motion was amended by Councilmember Shachner as follows: "if the proposal is a temporary or a permanent structure,Planning Commission shall obtain an opinion from the appropriate safety forces,the building dept and/or the city engineer. Such review shall be completed within 7 days.Failure to timely to timely complete such a review shall not permit Planning Commission to reject such application." Ms. Swallow assured Commissioner Meyers that the Planning Commission would not be forced to approve submissions where the administration has concerns. She mentioned that the Commission could approve submissions conditioned upon favorable review by the administration and/or defer decisions in order to seek the review of the administration. Councilmember Bullock emphasized the need for speed and a menu of options in order to not lose businesses. He applauded the usual mode of careful, slow, and deliberate approvals but that we must prevent against any additional sources of delay in this situation. President O'Malley expressed confidence that the administration will not drag their feet on application and remarked that he sees no need to put a finer point on it. Ms. Swallow clarified that she is not anticipating any undue delays, however, the Planning Commission may need more than 7 days to review something or get further information. She noted that the Planning Commission is agreeable to meet as much as necessary and understands the urgency. Acting Director Milius echoed these comments. President O'Malley stated that he does not want to force the Planning Commission to approve something if the administration needs more time. Ms. Swallow again assured Council that neither the Planning Commission nor the administration intends to hold up any submissions. She stated that 7 days simply may not be enough time to evaluate a proposal,particularly if it is for a parklet, which is completely new to the City. Councilmembers had additional discussion and contemplated additional changes to the amendment currently under consideration. Councilmember Shachner remarked that the amendment is not meant to suggest anything improper or a lack of motivation by this administration. Assistant Director Swallow made the following suggested change to the proposed language in the amendment: "if the proposal is a temporary or a permanent structure,Planning Commission shall obtain an opinion from the appropriate safety department,the building dept and/of the city engineer. Such review shall be completed within 7 days of referral from the Planning Commission.Failure to timely to timely complete such a review shall not permit Planning Commission to reject such application." The language was so moved by Councilmember Shachner and seconded by Councilmember Bullock. A roll call vote was taken as follows: 4