minhous 07-27-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Director Leininger responded to a number of the suggestions and comments offered by councilmembers as follows: • He reiterated that Director Ducu has concerns about his department's ability to manage, install and remove barriers for businesses. He stated that the purchase of new barriers would not be an eligible expense under the CARES Act. • That while the City is working to make parklets available that protecting this space for the general public is also a priority. • Parklets should be confined to the frontage of the business, similar to regulations on other outdoor dining and food trucks. • Umbrellas and shade structures would be very close to the street and potentially act as projectiles. • 18 inches is an appropriate buffer to allow cars to maneuver around the parklet. Director Leininger stated that the City is currently working with LBM on a parklet proposal and that they have been able to work within these draft guidelines thus far. In response to questions by Councilmember Kepple, the administration confirmed that there would be no fee for a parklet application and that there could be potential opportunities for parklets associated with retail businesses. Regarding guideline 412, Councilmember Kepple suggested that parklet space could be used as a waiting area. She thanked everyone for their work on the document and concluded that it is overall very clear and workable. Frank Scalish addressed the committee. He has been working with the owners of LBM on a parklet design. He expressed excitement about moving forward and asked clarifying questions about the guidelines,particularly regarding 45 and the 18"buffer. He asked if this was applicable to parklets that are not bordered by parking. Director Leininger replied that the guidelines are simply guidelines and that flexibility may be exercised based on the conditions. Councilmember Shachner made closing remarks. Housing, Planning & Development Committee adjourned at approximately 7:00 p.m. 3