MIN 07-20-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Discussion: President O'Malley noted that there are some proposals to amend the resolution after speaking with members of Council, the Mayor, and the public. He expressed concern about passing the resolution tonight and highlighted more opportunities for further discussion with Council continuing to meet in August. He spoke to positive and negative examples of restaurants and business operating under social distancing guidelines. Councilmember Shachner stated that he believes city action on the issue is needed due to mixed messaging occurring on the state and federal levels of government. He noted that the county mask mandates gives Lakewood time and does not necessitate immediate action on this resolution. He stated that he would like to see a face covering mandate be required throughout the entirety of this emergency. He added that the 50% mark in the resolution may not be a good fit, and that more input from restaurateurs and retailers is needed. Councilmember Kepple stated that the intent of the resolution is to support business owners who are being responsible. She spoke to a need to ensure the occupancy section of the resolution fits with businesses that are already implementing good practices. Mayor George provided background on the resolution. She spoke to how her administration and the city was largely taking cues from Governor DeWine's administration at the beginning of the pandemic, due to his strong response to the coronavirus. However his response has lessened over time and he did not implement a statewide mask mandate as expected, so other cities began to do so on their own. She highlighted differences in penalties between Lakewood's proposal and the state's, noting that Lakewood's penalty is only civil in nature and the state's is a criminal misdemeanor. She noted potential amendments to the 50% occupancy threshold. Councilmember Bullock applauded the leadership of the administration on the issue. He stated that sections 4 and 5, which define the proposed occupancy threshold, need some work and suggested making the penalty more serious from a financial standpoint. He stated a need to understand the enforcement of the proposal. Councilmember Neff stated her opposition to the 50% occupancy proposal. She highlighted the importance of making establishments aware that it is their responsibility to follow COVID-19 regulations. She noted that small businesses and restaurants make up the fabric of the Lakewood community. She stated many businesses can operate safely with greater than 50% occupancy and that the proposed rule could cause many of them to shut down. Vice President Litten stated his belief that many businesses have been in compliance and fear of creating unintended consequences with a 50% occupancy rule. He expressed a desire to examine how the city could further enforce state mandates. Public Comment: