minhhs 07-27-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Director Corrigan added that the advantage of using the nuisance chapter is that the process is already established and proven effective, including a built-in appeals process. Councilmember Litten noted that negative press and social media from enforcement against an establishment can often penalize the business and its reputation. Councilmember Shachner disagreed that such negative press would deter the groups of people patronizing bars where violations are openly occurring. He agreed to defer to the administration regarding enforcement and penalties but expressed doubt about the strategy proposed in the resolution. Councilmember Bullock expressed support for the amended version. He suggested an amendment to amend Section 4 to allow businesses to utilize physical barriers in lieu of six feet social distancing. In response to questions by Councilmember Bullock, Director Corrigan provided clarification about enforcement of the resolution. Councilmember Kepple restated her concerns that the proposed penalties under the nuisance chapter would not be enough to deter the boldest offenders. She pointed to an equity issue whereby the smallest businesses will be penalized and the largest may thumb their noses at the regulations. Tom Fraiser of First Federal of Lakewood expressed support for legislation and enforcement of masks and social distancing. He discussed how he has had 150 employees working from home since March and that employees would feel more comfortable returning to the office knowing that Lakewood is prioritizing safety. Chief Dunphy & Acting Chief Wilkins expressed support for using the nuisance process as part of the enforcement strategy. Chief Dunphy remarked that a business's reputation is more important than the particular fine and Acting Chief Wilkins explained how the nuisance process has worked as an effective deterrent in many cases, including repeated calls for false alarms. A member if the public, Ralph Piunno asked questions about the proposed legislation. In response to Mr. Piunno's questions, the committee discussed what constitutes an appropriate barrier. Director Corrigan also clarified that Sec. I of the legislation addresses proper mask use in that it defines face covering as any material that covers the individual's nose, mouth and chin. Ian Andrews of Lakewood Alive thanked the committee and the administration for responding to the feedback of businesses. He expressed support and praised the legislation as a smart approach. He emphasized that a large number of businesses want to comply and are being safe. A motion was made and seconded to recommend the substitute version of Resolution 2020-45 for adoption. Discussion: Councilmember Bullock expressed support for the legislation and stated that he will be submitting an amendment for discussion on the floor. 3