Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Rader asked a question which highlighted that the City has received no new <br /> public health guidance regarding outdoor dining since the resolution was originally adopted. <br /> Given the absence of any update, Councilmember Rader expressed his support for the resolution. <br /> A motion was made and seconded to recommend the substitute version of Resolution 2020-31A <br /> for adoption. <br /> A roll call vote was conducted as follows: <br /> Yeas: Shachner, Kepple, Rader <br /> Nays: none <br /> Motion adopted. Minutes approved. <br /> ORDINANCE 17-2020 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it <br /> receives the affirmative vote of at least five members of Council, or otherwise to take <br /> effect and be in force after the earliest period allowed by law, amending Section 1325.04, <br /> Authority of the Board, to include the exterior painting of existing natural brick structures <br /> within the authority of the Architectural Board of Review. <br /> Assistant Director Swallow introduced the ordinance, explaining that it is meant to ensure that <br /> the Architecture Board of Review provides review and approval before brick can be painted. <br /> Currently there is nothing in the Code which gives ABR jurisdiction solely over the painting of <br /> brick. <br /> Ms. Swallow remarked that part of the rationale of the ordinance is that painting brick can be <br /> detrimental and that painting it may hold in moisture and lead to quicker deterioration. Paint may <br /> also be used to attempt to cover up structural issues. <br /> Building Commissioner Meyers took exception to the assertion that painting brick causes it to <br /> deteriorate. He provided examples of how painting brick may protect the brick, if done correctly. <br /> President O'Malley spoke to the aesthetic concerns about painting brick. He referred to a recent <br /> project on the commercial corridor where a large brick structure was painted. He remarked that <br /> there are many smaller scale projects that require review by ABR. He stated that the legislation is <br /> not intended to prohibit the practice but to ensure that there is a fair level of review to maintain <br /> the character of the City. <br /> In response to a councilmember's question, Ms. Swallow advised that more specific aesthetic <br /> standards would have to be drafted to help guide ABR. <br /> It was clarified that the legislation as written applies to all structures, both residential and <br /> commercial. President O'Malley expressed his openness to narrowing the parameters to just <br /> commercial_ Councilmember Shachner expressed interest in narrowing the legislation. <br /> 2 <br />