Laserfiche WebLink
SEY-2I-2UU4 'l'UE 01:08 PM MAYFIELD BD OF ED FAX N0, 4409957205 -- P. 07 <br />page 6 <br />September 14, 2004 <br />6, Did vve spead auy operatfng funds on the new centrai offlce which could hxve been used <br />for materials, staff and textbooks? <br />No monies from the operating budgat were used to finance the Centra! Oftice. Cost of <br />this new construction is being paid for by the previoLis sale of board-ovsrned properiy in Gates <br />Mills that was unsuitable for school use. By Ohio Revised Code theproceeds from that sale <br />eari oniy be used far buildings. None of thosc monies can be used £or aperation. As you <br />remember, we had to move out of the old administrative building at 784 S.O.M. Center Road <br />when it was deemed unsafe for ofiice use by the 'V'illage and structural engineers. Moving <br />into the new offices will also save the district $5,579 per month, the cost of leasing office <br />spACe at Alpha Park, our current location. <br />7. 1VVhen citizens tetl us "The schools have plenty of money." How should I respond? <br />Ohio districts are making cuts largely because of the way Ohio tax law works. Generally, <br />Ohia law prevents taxes from gowing as property values go up_ It's called a reduction <br />factQr, and it ste.ms from legislation passed in 1976 (House Bi11920). At that time, inflatiori <br />was a problem, and lawmakers were flooded wifh complaints of over taxation_ The law <br />effectively stopped most property taxes from going up because property values increased. So <br />uuless new tax issues are passed, local revenue for schoois remains virtually stagnant. <br />•Here's ars example: Tf a tax levy, passed in 1995, raised $1 million, it's capped. to raise no <br />more tharx that amount in auy year, for as long as the issue is in efFect. And if that issue is <br />continuing, vviuch all of otus are, that means our revenue cYoes not rise with inflation. <br />According to the auditor's office, the Mayfield sehool district is eollecting on voter- <br />approved levies that total 66.10 mills. But in effect, we're raisiag na more than 28.47 <br />mxlls (effective mUlage) since the taxes levied are capped. Cities have incvnie tax revenue <br />which tend to rise with inflation. Schools revenue is caped which puts them. on the ballot <br />much m,ore often. <br />8. I3ow do our adxnfuistrative expenditures compare to other Cuyahoga County districts? <br />We are 10th in the county in our per pupil cost for admi-nistrators and we have a lower <br />number of administrators in Mayfield compared to otlier suburban districts. In fact we have <br />the same number of administrators paid out of district.funds as we did in 1998-99. <br />9. Even though our student enroliment has sr$yed relatively stAble, uur staff numbers <br />have risen - why is that:Y <br />7f you compare our regular classroorn teaching staff now with 1998-99 there is little <br />difference. Our increases have occurred in staff who work with special education, <br />technology and state mstnndated student intervention.