My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994 021 Ordinance
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Ordinances Resolutions
>
1994 Ordinances
>
1994 021 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2018 4:00:44 PM
Creation date
8/22/2018 10:26:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Ordinance
Number
021
Date
6/20/1994
Year
1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PAGE TWO <br />Pit Bulls and Rotweilers. This ordinance, in my opinion, stretches the <br />law as far as possible within the legal decisions that we have available <br />to us. It appears to be quite workable, and is quite protective of our <br />citizenry. <br />Section 505.11(a) categorizes dangerous dogs as well as "vicious" <br />dogs, and goes as far as to identify vicious dogs not only by past <br />actions such as aggressive behavior towards people or other doKjs, but <br />also identifies "vicious dog" as a breed commonly known as a"Pit Bull <br />Dog". It is this type of language that could cause difficulties in the <br />enforcement of our ordinance, but if it is going to have difficulty, I <br />see no problem amending it to include "Rotweilers" within this <br />definition. <br />The ordinance as it currently exists goes on to establish certain <br />safety precautions for "vicious dogs". These include a closed and <br />locked pen, which has a top, and while off premises the dog is required <br />to be on a specified type of leash, or have a muzzle, or locked pen with <br />a top. Subparagraph (c) also requires that the owner or keeper of a <br />vicious dog must keep an extra liability insurance policy of not less <br />than $50,000.00 for potential bodily injury or damage caused by a <br />vicious dog. <br />The penalty under our existing code is quite severe involving <br />felonies of the fourth degree, and misdemeanors of the first degree, <br />depending on the type of violation of this ordinance. <br />To summarize, it is my opinion that our existing ordinance is quite <br />sufficient for the protection of our citizenry, within the existing <br />legal boundaries that we are aware of; in the alternative, the <br />definition of vicious dog could be extended to include more than "Pit <br />Bull"; or, if you are willing to tread new legal territory, we could <br />prohibit outright the existence of Pit Bulls or Rotweilers within the <br />Villace once you have completed and obtained a study identifying <br />breeding traits or some characteristics that can separate a Pit Bull and <br />Rotweiler from other dogs. <br />I will await your further instructions <br />:r,r tz-u Y,yours, <br />70?? _ <br />Director of <br />- ?.. <br />JWD:nmp <br />cc: Mayor Rinker <br />Ordinance Review Committee
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.