Laserfiche WebLink
Village of Mayfield <br />September 11, 2009 <br />Page 6 <br />If redacting this personal information compromises the audit or the ability to prepare financial statements, <br />the public office and the AOS will consider these exceptions on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, if <br />redacting this information creates a hardship on the public office in terms of resources, recordkeeping or <br />other issues, the public office and the AOS may collaborate on alternative methods of providing the public <br />office's data to the AOS without compromising the personal information of individuals served by the public <br />office. The AOS is willing to work with the public office and it is our intent to greatly reduce the amount of <br />personal information submitted to the AOS for audit or financial statement preparation purposes. It is <br />important that the public office review internal policies to find ways to eliminate as much personal <br />information from financial records as possible by substituting non-personal information (i.e., change social <br />security numbers to employee identification numbers). <br />Fee <br />Except for any changes in fees and expenses which may result from the circumstances described above, <br />we expect our fees and expenses for our audit services will not exceed $12,630.00. <br />Access to Our Reports and Working Papers <br />Statement on Auditing Standards No. 87 (SAS 87, Restricting the Use of an Auditor's Report), requires <br />our reports to disclose the following: <br />Our Independent Accountants' Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on <br />Compliance and Other Matters Required by Governmenf Auditing Standards, is intended solely for <br />the information and use of the management, those charged with governance and federal awarding <br />agencies and pass-through entities. It is not intended for anyone other than these specified parties. <br />SAS 87 requires us to include this restrictive language in our reports due to concerns that other readers <br />may not fully understand the purpose of the report, the nature of the procedures applied in its preparation, <br />the basis or assumptions used in its preparation, the extent to which the procedures performed are <br />generally known or understood, and the potential for the report to be misunderstood, when taken out of <br />the context for which it was intended. <br />However, under Revised Code Section 117.26, an audit report becomes a public record under Section <br />149.43, Revised Code, when we file copies of the report with the public officers enumerated in the <br />Revised Code. When we file the reports, our working papers become available to the public upon <br />request, subject to information protected for criminal investigations, by attorney-client privilege or by local, <br />state or federal law. SAS 87 does not affect public access to our reports or working papers. <br />Under generally accepted auditing standards, we must retain working papers for five years after the <br />release date of our opinion. <br />Peer Review Report <br />As required by Government Auditing Standards, we have attached a copy of our most recent external <br />quality control review report (Peer Review). The report was unqualified.