Laserfiche WebLink
04/18l20D8 TsU 15:01 FAx mOQ71D14 <br />Flanning and Zo:ning Meeting Minutes <br />December 3, 2007 <br />Page 6 <br />tonight, but when he came into the parking lat, the lot was fiill. If we axe going to have a <br />lot of events gaing on in this building, the shared parking over there at night when they <br />are closed is pxobably going to be a benefiit far yaur night activities here. <br />Mr. Marrotte said, tlvnk of the coxxcauzse when they aze opea at night and you have <br />somethxng going here, it is goxng to be touch and go. <br />Mr. Regan stated that we sit in tkae VilIage and we talk about horav good Pxagressirre has <br />been financially for the Vi11age. You will look at Heinen's and that benefits eweryone. <br />Heinen's has iaeen a good oitizen. Heineza's is as good a public use as there is in tlus <br />communiry. 1VIx, Regan daes not thiza.lc reaching aut and doing something Iike #his is nat <br />precedent setting. It is public use, It is already attached to a commercial sixuctuxe. Xt is <br />not like thxs house aut there that is sitting in iesidential.. <br />Mz', Mazrotte asked i£ tlxe same position would be taicen if they decided to use the parking <br />lot for their irucks to emp#y their laads like the beer trucks do gow? Mr. Marrotte was <br />adviised fihat it depexids upon what tim.e. If we were able to monitor that at a certain tim.e <br />and certain distauce and it worked out best for everyone, we shauld talce a look at it. <br />1VIr, Marratte advised that he is not questioning Heinen's value to the Village. He is a <br />littXe ooncerned abaut the precedence of hovc? yau are jockeying your attitudes taward <br />residenti.at zones. Tonight we may say tlaat's fine but someone is going to oome in here <br />and stick it to us and say, "Yau did it for them, yon gotta do it for me." IvJ'r.1VlaxXOtte was <br />advised ihat you don't have to with conditional use permxts tbaugb. It is not pxecedent <br />setting, <br />Mr. Regan stated that Heinen's is nat com,xmg to us asking us to put a nartheast entrance <br />in. We are going to them and say;ing, wouId yau do this and we are saying essemtially <br />that it is because we think it is gaad for the Village. They are gaing to get the same <br />amount of money. The cash regjster can only ring sa ma,ny times. <br />Mr. Marrotte staled thAt he disagrees wiih the administration. <br />Mr. Regan stat.ed that xt may turn out that tbxs parlcing Ibt and that entrance is a aea] loser <br />for everyone, but bS' the desiga we are seeimg t$ere, it is certaialy more attractive than <br />what we gQt now. <br />Chairman. Farmer asked if there v<<as anythixzg else. There was no furthEr discussion. <br />Chairman Fa,rnier asked wha.t vve need motions on tonight for. Is parlting an issue? <br />Mx. Marrelli said not zf there is a finding that the LA,w Directar's apinion would stand and <br />1;he Iots are adjacent and the 1'lanni-ag Cominission chooses to invoke the ordinancc that <br />says wc cata share up to 50°10 of the xequired parki.ng. <br />Chairman Farmer asked if what wc vwould be voti.ng on would be somc kind of a land <br />1ease betweev the two.