My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013 001 Ordinance
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Ordinances Resolutions
>
2013 Ordinances
>
2013 001 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2018 4:06:24 PM
Creation date
9/7/2018 4:45:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Ordinance
Number
001
Date
6/17/2013
Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P & Z Minutes <br />Dec 3, 2012 <br />Pg #7 <br />having it here at a forum. We've tried that. All I'm asking you is to cooperate with us and give <br />you what you want and we do it in a fzrst class manner. That's all we're asking. <br />Chuck Kinnaird said first of all I want to say that is untrue. When this all first started, you guys <br />knew about this for how long`? I did not know anything about this until that meeting when you <br />came saying you were going to do this development, the very first meeting in March. <br />Sam Cannata said we tried to call you four weeks ago, you didn'treturn our call. <br />Chairman Pro-Tem Regan interjects, folks, folks..... <br />Michael Gatto said it's real easy. We're going to work this out. It's going to be difficult to put <br />it inexact writing today since we don't know what the plans are. We're going to sit down with <br />you when we figure out as we get towards that 100' buffer from the back. We'll work out with <br />you a reasonable screening which will be determined by the Village, by us and by you, three <br />entities sitting down working out what's reasonable. We don't really have a problem with <br />fencing, with mounding, with landscaping, whatever the situation is at hand that we end up <br />with. It could turn out where we have a building back there that's a little bit closer and instead <br />of putting a mound there, we just put some tall pine trees because in order to get a mound dug <br />up it might come 3/a's into your backyard. We'11 work it out. As far as fencing goes, we don't <br />have a problem with an 8' or 6' fence. Part of the issue you have with fencing, I don't disagree <br />with, but if you start. with a fence at one end and go to the other end, all they have to do is walk <br />around one corner or the other. Security wise, it's not going to give you anything unless you <br />decide to run the fence east to your house. But I can see blocking out the lights and stuff like <br />that. I think the key is we'll work towardsas we get to that last plan, we'll sit down with the <br />Landscape Architect, the Village, you and me and plan it all out. <br />Chuck Kinnaird said nothing that I'm asking is stopping you from moving forward. <br />Chairman Pro-Tem Regan said folks I very much appreciate you bringing to our attention what <br />you're looking for and we will without a doubt pay attention to that when the landscape plan is <br />brought before us. It's on record. Given the timing and everything else, that's where we have to <br />go today. <br />David Hartt recommends motion for consideration. At the end of condition number 4; we can <br />add which will include the 3' mound on the Kinnaird property, a privacy fence approximately 6 <br />to 8 feet and evergreens or alternatives of equally protective screening as approved by the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission. No matter what they say, it's ultimately your responsibility <br />to make the final call. <br />ECISIO <br />Mr. Marquardt, seconded by Dr. McGrath made a motion to accept Mr. Hartt's proposed <br />language as modified: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.