Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Mr. 'S'txater_,. seaonded. b9 Mrs.. Brown, that the rnles of <br />law requiring an ordinance to be resd on tIar.ee. separate_. occasions be suspended. <br />Rog1. Call; Ayes - Messrs .TaylorrWedler.,StraterrBrown,Zorn and Hopkfus. <br />1Vays - 1Vone. • - <br />Motion cara3ed. <br />Rules Snspeaded <br />? It was moved by Mr..Wedler, seconded .by Mr. Strater, that Ordinance No. <br />652 be approved and passed as read. Roll Call: Ayes - Messrs TaylorsWedler,,Strater,BrawnjZorn and Hapkins. <br />. N3y5 - Norie, _ <br />Mot3.on earr3ed <br />- fhdinance Passed <br />- <br />The C3erk tYien presented a request from the East Ohio Gas Co. for approval <br />of proposed constructa.on of gas main and serv3.ee between the sidewa3k. snd eurb <br />on the West side of Beech Hill Road and North s3.de of Glernri.ew Road,9 as indicated <br />a.n red on their Drawing No. D-6859, dated November 21, 1957. <br />It was moved by Mr. Hmpk3ns, seconded l7g Mr. Strater' that approval be <br />granted, sn.b3ect to piroperts* owners' ca!rsent. <br />---- Rol:L Ca].7.: Ayes - Messrs Taylar.,Wedler,Strater,Brawn,Zorn and Hopkins. <br />Nays - None. <br />. . . Motion carri.ed <br />It was moved-by Mr. Strater, secvnded by Mr. Taglor, that the Annual <br />Mainten,ance perm3t for 1959 submitt,ed by the Ohio Bell Teleghone Company be <br />renewed.. • , <br />Roll Ca]1: Aqes - Messrs Taylor.Wedler.,Strater,Brawn.,Zorn & Hopkins. <br />Nays - None. <br />.- . , Motion carried <br />The ded3cat3.on of Robley Lane then came ap for considerati.on bg Council. <br />The V3]lage was to get an easement for difi.ches, which was presented by Mr.Ed.elman. <br />Mayor Endres s then asked for s report from the Committee which was to inspect <br />rthe road wi-l-,h our engineer.. The Comrru.tt.se reported .that they had met on Satvrday <br />morning and inspected ftobley Lane am1 found t,he road 3.n acceptable coxid3.t?i.on. <br />Mr. Peterson reported that the road was in an eXCeptional condition. There was <br />considerable d3sczxssion.in Catxncil., most1.y; on the advisabili.t,y of, accept3ng a road <br />3.n the middle of the wint,er. Mr. Strater said that he did not thir;k that a <br />repor.°t of the roads corxiition at this ta.m of t,he year seemed justifiable <br />evidence that 'it should be dedicated - as trouble mi.ght arise in the spr3ng. <br />Mr. Peterson said that orcl3nari].y this would be so, but the road had been und.er <br />operation for such a long period of _t3m that Coune3l wovld be perPectly safe <br />in accepting it on the premise that it would cause no trouble in the spri.ng. <br />4.