Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />?.?-? <br />`'t . <br />?° . Fa1.k s C <br />?,3.?i,-???-=?°ha:s?-1•no3?ed ozzzgh. we Urere breaki`n,g our owr_ 7aws <br />in dedicat3ng.the straetsy becau5e it°was contrax7 to oux° ordinan.cea l1ro <br />Edelman said that the matuer was started a year ago and was considercd as a <br />hardship case and that he thought a.t was all right becau.se of the reason prevail,- <br />3ng wLiich would creeue a hardshipo . <br />MrQ Taylor, seconded by Mrs. Browm, thep,-introduced Qrdinance No. 551 <br />entitled: "An as°dinan.ee Accepting North Woodlari?t1tguth Woodlane Drive, <br />Woodlane _ Driye' _Norman Lane, and the undecl3..cated portion of Worton ParY Dri.ve <br />for dedication", which os°clinance zaas read to Couneil. It was moved Ty Nrs. Browm, seconded by Mr. ralka theu the rules af <br />l,a-r requix°in.g an ordinaaice to be read on tYu°ee sepaxate occasa.ons be suspend.ed. <br />Rol1 Call: Ayes - M-essrs Taylor, T?edlez°9 Broti,m9 Falk and. Hopkzns. <br />_ Vays - None. . = - <br />Klotion carriecl <br />Rules suspended <br />It was moved by Mrs. Brown, sec onded by T°ir. Falk, that Ordinance No. <br />551 be approved and passed as s°ead, <br />R01,1. Call: Ayes - Messrs Taylor.,Wedlsr' Brown9 Fa1k and N-opkins. <br />Nays - None. <br />- Motion caa'ried Ordinance passed <br />Mayor EncLress then read a].e°ttar :Crom ths City of Cleve]°and, stating <br />that after October lst, the C1ty af C1,mueland would not grant contracts for <br />water in a.ny area not pr°ovideel wit,h sanitary sewers and sewage treatment <br />faci]aties approved by the State Board of Healtho There tiwa.s agreat deal of <br />discussion on this letter, as s ome of its term,s were s1a.;htly arnbiguous. <br />TYu.s brought up our prospective in.stal].ation of water on Lander Road and. Mr. <br />• Edelman said we could not go ahead witiiout Hi,hland HeigYgts and they would <br />have to await the outcome of electionm <br />The Zoning a.nd Planning Board said that this letter, if interpreted <br />as a.t stands; would ki7l all buildine development not covered by sanitary <br />sewers an.d would divide the va.LLa.ge i.n two parts and ki.]1 a7.l devel-opment in <br />the part wi-U?iout sewers. <br />Mro EdeJsnan was then asked to find out i-f any legal action was to be <br />taken against this declarationa Mr. Reed-also asked NZro Edelman to- find out <br />what rules they wou7.d have to work with. <br />The C1erk was then asked to run off sorm copies of this I.etter. <br />Nro James T'Ier1e, At•torney far T2r. Fisher, then requested that Thornapply <br />]}rive be acceptecl for dedication. Qur Engineer said that Council should make <br />up a conmiittee and inspect the road_before decLa.cating, ' <br />5.