Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Shaw, seconded by Mr. Davis, introduced Ordinance No. 1006,entitled: <br />"An Ordinance Levying Special Assessments f or the Improvement of Worton Parlc <br />Drive, North Gfoodlane Drive, Norman Lane, South Taoodlane Drive in the Village <br />of rlayfield, by Grading Draining and Paving With Asphaltic Materials, Together <br />taith All Necessary Appurtenances," which ordinance was read to Council. <br />Mr. GJallcer, seconded by Mr. Busa, moved that the rules of law requiring <br />an Ordinance to be read on three,separate occasions be suspended. <br />Roll Call: Ayes - Messrs Shaw, Busa, Walker, Tlason, Sloan & Davis. <br />Nays - None. <br />, Motion carried <br />Rules Suspended <br />rlr. Shaw, seconded by 14r. Walker, moved that Ordinance No.. 1006 be <br />approved and passed as read.. <br />Roll Call: Ayes - Niessrs Shaw, Busa, Walker_, Mason,, Sloan & Davis. <br />Nays, - None,. <br />Motion carried <br />Ordittance Passed <br />Mr. rlason, seconded by Mr. Shaw, introduced Resolution No. 705, entitled: <br />"A I2esolution Declaring the Necessity to Improve Certain Besignated Streets <br />Within the Village of Mayfield, Ohio, by Supplying Said Streets With Electric <br />Lighting", which ordinance was read to Council. <br />Mr. Busa, seconded by Mr. Mason, moved that the rules of law requiring <br />a resolution to be read on three separate occasions be suspended. <br />Roll Call: Ayes - Nlessrs Shaw, Busa, jJalker, Mason, Sloan & Davis. <br />. . . .. . Nays - None. <br />Alotion Carried <br />Rules Suspended <br />IvIr. Mason, seconded by DZr. Walker, moved that Resolution No. 705 be <br />approved and.passed as read. Roll Call: Ayes - Nlessrs Shaw, Busa, Walker, Niason, Sloan & Davis. <br />Nays d None. <br />tIotion Carried <br />Resolution Passed <br />Recess for ten minutes. <br />Engineer•s Report - Mr. Peterson. <br />Mr. Peterson received a bid of $1,661.25 for the sidewalks on SONI Center <br />from Sandalwood to G]ilson Mills Road. Since this price exceed's the estimated <br />price, we cannot proceed. The bids will be rejected, as the best bi-d,exceeds <br />the estimated price by more than 15%. <br />4.