Laserfiche WebLink
~~~ <br />-4- <br />OLD BUSINESS• <br />Ordinance 76-13; entitled: "OFF-STREET PARKING". <br />Given second reading. Public Hearing date set for May 25, 1976 <br />at 7:30 P.M. in the Village~Hall. Notice to appear in newspaper <br />week of April 19th. <br />NEW BUSINESS: <br />Ordinance 76-1~, entitled; "AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE OPERATION <br />OF A TRUCI{ UPON THAT PORTION OF WILSON MILLS ROAD EAST OF SOM CENTER <br />ROAD WITHIN THIS MUNICIPALITY; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT: AND PRE- <br />SCRIBING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF ITS PROVISION; AND DECLAR- <br />ING AN EMERGENCY", was introduced by Mr. Flynn. <br />Given first reading. <br />Resolution 926, entitled; "A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CLEVELAND <br />REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT TO TAKE WHATEVER STEPS ARE NECESSARY TO <br />EXPAND ITS STATUTORY PURPOSE UNDER OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 6119.01 <br />TO INCLUDE THE SUPPLY OF WATER TO USERS WITIIIN AND L•~ITHOUT THE <br />DISTRICT AND TO UNDERTAKE NEGOTIATIONS TO ASSUME THE P.ESPONSIBILITY <br />OF OPERATING AND MANAGING THE REGIONAL TiTATER SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF <br />CLEVELAND, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY", caas introduced by Council as <br />a Whole. <br />Mr. Busa, seconded by Mr. Schulte, made a motion to adopt <br />Resolution 926. <br />Mr. Bennett questioned if there were any expenditures on our part? <br />Mr. Byrnes replied no. <br />Roll Call: AYES: Messrs., Barclay, Bennett, Busa, Flynn, Grogan, <br />I4Irs. Negrelli and Mr. Schulte <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Resolution Adopted <br />Ordinance 76-15, entitled; "AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING I~4AYFIELD VILLAGE, <br />OHIO TO JOIN WITH OTHER MUNICIPALITIES IN LITIGATION AGAINST THE <br />CITY OF CLEVELAND WITH REGARD TO WATER SERVICE; AUTHORIZING THE <br />SUBURBAN WATER TASK FORCE COMMITTEE OF THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY P~lAYOR5 <br />AND CITY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION TO COORDINATE EFFORTS AND RECEIVE [AND <br />EXPEND FUNDS THEREFOR; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY", was introduced <br />by Mr. Barclay. <br />Mayor Beebe stated that about 50/ of the communities were partici- <br />pating. <br />Mr. Grogan questioned if litigation continues would we be subjected <br />to additional costs? <br />Mr. Byrnes replied that use would not be required to pay additional <br />costs only amount listed in Ordinance 76-15 <br />