Laserfiche WebLink
8. <br />ORDIl~1~iJCE X71-42: sir. Fitz-Gerald, seconded by I~~Ir. Bordonaro, <br />introduced O1tiDIJhiV~CD j#71-42, Entitled : "1~id OriDIidhl~tCs 1~i~iE~~ID- <br />I~.dG OhDIid.(~11VC.u 1V0. 1017 BY ~1~:CI~G SLCTIOiV 2 (a) GNIlvG TriE <br />K~SISTK~dT TO Tl-iE CL.~RK-TtcLxSUtt%lz 'rr1L xU1ri0hITY TO aTGld r~iIlVTJTL~, <br />ORDIidl~idCE, FtEa0LU1'IOi.Ja ~sJD CLFtTIFIC1~l'L~ Ind TnZ ~sSLl~CL OF `liL <br />CI,EkK-T1tLASUxER." 1vlr. Bordonaro, seconded by iyIr. .Leech, made <br />a motion to suspend the rules of law requiring an ordinance <br />to be read on three separate occasions. boll Call: ~YLS: <br />ifiessrs. Zeech, Fitz-Gerald, Bordonaro, Boger and Davis. hThY;~: <br />iVone . <br />Ifiotion Carried <br />Proles Suspended <br />IJir. Bordonaro, seconded by t~ir. Zeech, moved that Ordinance <br />#71-42 be approved and passed as read. Roll Call: AYLS: <br />Ivlessrs. Zeech, Fitz-Gerald, Bordonaro, Boger and Davis. <br />idxYa : 1Jone . <br />i'-lotion Carried <br />Ordinance i'assed <br />Law Suit-Lucretia Van Curen: i•1r. Leech, seconded by iVlr. <br />ri z- era ma e a mo ion to authorize the solicitor to <br />defend i~iayfield Village in the lawsuit brought against the <br />village by Lucretia Van Curen. Roll Call: 1-iY-i~a: ;iessrs. <br />beech, Fitz-Gerald, Bordonaro, Boger and i~avis. wxYa: <br />None . <br />i•iotion Carried <br />Sept. 24, 1971 there will be a meeting to discuss violations <br />of Mayfield Village relative to water quality, Take Lrie <br />and a treatment facility. Our engineer was requested to <br />attend this meeting and bring back information at our next <br />meeting of council. <br />Village Clerk-treasurer: i~ir. Lockemer: i~o report. <br />Council r'resident Leech: "I recommend underground utilities. <br />vde have no ordinance covering underground utilities through- <br />out the village and I'd like to have one prepared to do this. <br />Councilman Boer: "Our ordinance relative to cats and dogs <br />running loose needs amending. I'd like to see a tightening <br />up of this ordinance." <br />Comments from the floor: i~~Ir. Smith stated that l~enwood, <br />sandalwood, ~dalnut and Butternut Drives have no street name <br />signs. also, I would like to refer the aafety and Service <br />Committee to give consideration to light on the east side <br />of the street as the easterly side of the street is very <br />dark. <br />Chief Siiortle: attted that he is giving consideration to <br />