Laserfiche WebLink
Special Council Meeting <br />1/2/95 <br />Page Four <br />year, Dr. Abbott had mentioned it, he is going to give us an annual report--at the end of <br />the year this is what we have done with $100,000. The Historical Society has done that <br />when they first got off the ground, a lot of people were skeptical. It is a different <br />program with the same idea. People dedicated to a project have regularly reported <br />back. Each year, before we put $2,500 in there or whatever special expenditures, there , <br />is some understanding of where the money is going to go. This, he sees as the same. <br />Council could, annually, come back and say, "we don't like this, we don't want to spend <br />that money" and would have the power--it would be breaking its commitment, but <br />there is nothing that would prohibit Council from doing that. He thinks it would <br />generate controversy. We might get a lawsuit out of it. He does not see that it would <br />accomplish anything except be non-productive, but the power is there. What is the <br />problem (and I am open, because I frankly think 15 years is the commitment and I <br />would stick with this.) I have suggested it. He knows Wally and Sandy had concerns. <br />They have come a long way and have talked to their own neighbors about how <br />responsible, how we can control the money. His thought was we shouldn't be afraid of <br />this; we should look at this negatively, but he thinks it is a very positive thing. We will <br />impose certain criteria and expect that they will stick by it. The presumption being that <br />we will renew this for the additional years. It will go for the life of the 15 year <br />abatement barring some major problem. That is what he proposed this legislation <br />should read as. That is generally the reason. <br />Mr. Ferrante said the only comment he has is that the people he has spoken to are <br />coneerned that money is coming from Mayfield Village but is not going to be totally <br />spent on Mayfield Village residents. That is where most of the objections are that have <br />come to him. If we could spend all that money at Mayfield Center School, that would <br />be one thing. He knows that is not possible, but he thinks we need to have from them <br />where they have spend the money. That is the commitment he wants to see in writing <br />from them periodically. <br />Mayor Rinker said we make expenditures all the time that benefit people other than <br />Mayfield Village residents. Our entire Recreation program, anything we have put on <br />the highways, we spend those dollars for public highways. <br />Mr. Ferrante said it is not the same thing. <br />Mayor Rinker said there is a point beyond which he thinks we don't operate the school. <br />It seemed a logical dividing line to say we are looking at Center School and the High <br />School, which are both physically in our borders. After all, the teachers that work in <br />that school system pay our taxes. There are a lot of things to be derived directly back <br />from those facilities. So, by limiting it at least to those facilities, whether the students at