Laserfiche WebLink
13 '`.?. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Council Meeting <br />8/17/92 <br />Page Nine <br />Mr. Flynn said he helped introduce this legislation. These are people who have volunteered many <br />hours over the years. Because of the amount of expertise we are getting from ttiem, Mr. Flynn <br />said he feels it would be well worth the fee. <br />Mr. Ferrante said he is under the impression this they were not looking for any more money. <br />Mr. Basile said his brother-in-law said there was no need for it. Mr. Flynn said the request came through the Building Commissioner. <br />Mr. Hovancsek said they could poll various cities and find out the rates they pay their plans <br />examiners. <br />Mr. Hovancsek said the Village will need an expert Plans Examiner to sign off that he concurs <br />Progressive Insurance meets the code. There is a lot of liability to the Plans Examiner. In this <br />situation, the chazges can be billed back to Progressive Insurance. He said the Village will need <br />someone with a lot of experience in that particular area. <br />After a lengthy discussion, Mr. Hovancsek suggested the legislation say "for all non-residential <br />review". He said Mr. Amendola handles the residenrial things himself. <br />Mrs. Cinco, seconded by Mr. Fixler, made a motion to amend Resolution No. 92-22 to make a <br />distinction between non-residential and commercial as Mr. Hovancsek suggested. <br />ROLL CAI.L: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None Morion Carried <br />Resolurion Amended <br />Mrs. Cinco, seconded by Mr. Basile, made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 92-22 as amended. <br />ROLL CALL: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Resolution Adopted <br />(as amended) <br />Third Reading of Ordinance No. 92-12, entitled; "An emergency ordinance establishing fees for <br />members of the Architectural Review Board, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Board of <br />Zoning Appeals, and amending Section 1305.05." Introduced by Mayor Pietrafese and Council as <br />a Whole. (First Reading 6/15/92, Second Reading 7/20/92.) <br />Mr. Flynn said it is an appointed board, rather unique; they aze not employees. This concept was <br />introduced in February or March and he does not understand why it is being dragged through the <br />machinery here. <br />Mrs. Cinco said they have received requests from other people for reconsideration of salary <br />ordinances, but have asked them to wait until the first of the year. So, to be consistent, she will <br />vote no tonight.