My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/09/1992 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1992
>
09/09/1992 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:15:34 AM
Creation date
7/23/2018 6:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
9/9/1992
Year
1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
149 <br />MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL <br />Mayfield Village <br />September 9, 1992 <br />The Council of Mayfield Village met in Special Session on Wednesday, September 9, 1992, at <br />5:04 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Village Hall. Council President Bruce Rinker presided. <br />ROLL CALL: Present: Mr. Basile, Mr. Busa, Nirs. Cinco, Mr. Fenante, Mr. Fixler, <br />Mr. Flynn, and Mr. Rinker <br />Absent: None <br />Also Present Were: Mayor Pietrafese, Miss Heath <br />Note: The following discussion is relative to a litigarion matter concerning Parkview Golf Course. <br />Mr. Rinker said they were here last week but they did not have everything executed. He was <br />advised that three copies of the agreement have been fully executed. (This includes the sections of <br />the setdement agreement, agreement of sale, and real estate option agreement.) He said they are <br />undated but we will fill in the date we accept this agreement; he sees no problem with that. Mr. <br />Rinker said he would pass around copies for everyone to look at (and did so at this time.) Mr. <br />Rinker said we do not have present counsel in the audience, and asked Mr. Welty (in the audience) <br />to conf'um that. <br />Mr. Welry said they no longer represent the LaConte's. T'hey were advised they were dismissed <br />from the case effective last Friday. <br />Mr. Fixler asked if three executed sets out of ten would be legally binding. <br />Mr. Rinker said that one set would be legal. <br />Mr. Flynn asked if the judge will accept three. <br />Mr. Rinker said all he needs is one. <br />Mr. Flynn asked the procedure from here on. <br />Mr. Rinker said first they submit it to the Court so they will dismiss the lawsuit. For our own <br />part, we need to appropriate monies. We should not pay anything until Judge Matia makes the <br />journal entry that it was dismissed; and we should not do anything further until we have <br />confirmation that the Probate Court has accepted the agreement. <br />Mr. Busa asked if they showed an executed date. <br />Mr. Rinker said we have not yet signed the agreement. We will write in the date when we pass the <br />resolution and that will become the effective date. <br />Mr. Flynn asked if we get word from Judge Maria and Probate Court that the lawsuit is dismissed, <br />then will it be up to us to pay them and to rescind the eminent domain ordinance. <br />Mr. Rinker said yes.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.