Laserfiche WebLink
The °°Replacement Survey" was conducted between the <br />dates of July 7 and July 13, 1980. The questions were posed <br />over the telephone and all responses have been recorded on the <br />tally sheets, copies of which are attached. Only registered <br />voters were contacted. When possible all registered voters <br />within a residence were polled. Due to time constraints the <br />sample was limited to 505 Village residents. A11 residents <br />whose names appeared on the Board of Elections roster of regis- <br />tered voters were called at least once. Many, although not all, <br />of those who were not home when the first call was made were <br />subsequently called back. <br />The following is a summary of the results: <br />=~ Question One Responses: <br />For Busa°s Appointment (104) 20~ <br />Against Busa°s Appointment (280) 56~ <br />Undecided (121) 24$ <br />TOTALS (505) 1000 <br />56~ of all persons polled were against Council appointing VD.nce <br />Busa. As can be seen from the vote total, the feeling was very <br />strong, almost 2-1/2 to 1, that if Mr. Busa is to serve again <br />he should do so by winning in a general election. The results <br />are made even more dramatic if the undecided vote is removed <br />and only those caho voted "yes" or "no°' are considered. Without <br />~ the undecided vote the sample size is reduced to 384 people and <br />_ the relative percentages become 73~ against Mr. Busa's appointment <br />~~~. <br />