Laserfiche WebLink
Special Council Meeting <br />3-10-08 <br />Page 8 <br />notice at the CUSIPS listed on the second page of the handout provided to Council. The <br />municipal bonds represented by those CUSIPS now have an effective rating of the Village's <br />rating which is A1. Consequently when people go to sell that, they are going to get a lower <br />price for those. <br />Mr. Brett stated that the only time this would impact us is if we decided to refund the <br />bonds or to purchase some of our own bonds for whatever reason. We may not be allowed to do <br />that, but if we elected to refund our bonds when we are able to call in those windows, that <br />would be the only time that would impact us, we may actually be paying less for our bonds than <br />what we would had the insurer not gone out of business because since we are buying it, the <br />persons selling it are selling something of lesser value. <br />Mr. Brett stated if we refund, we are essentially buying our stock back. If we buy our <br />municipal bonds back, they are not going to be worth as much, although again we might need to <br />do that on the secondary market as opposed to exercising the refund because the refund might <br />have a premium built in to it. <br />Dr. Parker asked about future bonds. Mr. Brett replied there are a couple of things going <br />on in that respect. The one thing is municipalities throughout the country are pretty much fed . <br />up with playing the red haired stepchild to business corporations. While this is all going on, <br />MBIA which is the largest bond insurer still maintains a AAA rating even though Mr. Brett <br />won't touch their stock with a 10 foot pole. But on a regular basis we get credit ratings that are <br />significantly below comparable companies in the private sector. Some municipalities, in <br />California in particular, are saying, this is enough you are costing taxpayers money because you <br />have two sets of standards, one for a private sector and one for a public sector. Again, this does <br />not effect the creditworthiness of our bonds, it just effects the insurance and the only thing Mr. <br />Brett can analogize it to is if someone told you that you carry Progressive, Progressive stock <br />has gone down, therefore the value of your car has gone down. It does not make sense. Mr. <br />Brett can see where you might have to pay extra interest if you owe the bank money on the car <br />but the actual value of the car does not decrease. Our bonds are still based upon our financial <br />situation not our insurers. <br />Mr. Marquardt stated if you sell new bonds you are driving the rate up. Mr. Brett said if <br />we sell new bonds, we won't be using XL Capital Assurance, Inc. as an insurer. We would be <br />going to essentially the free market. If there is not significant insurers out there willing to take <br />the risk we would go at A1 which is what we are doing now anyway. <br />Dr. Parker asked if potentially we have someone that will insure us at AAA, you would <br />have a higher level. Mr. Brett said that if Warren Buffet bails out MBIA and they stay in the <br />insurance business, there will be a line of insurers willing to insure us for a price. They will; <br />still be there. They are not losing money on the municipals, they are losing money on the <br />mortgage backed securities. If we go out short term, we might get paid to borrow money. <br />Right now, what he figured on the notes in the first year, he expects that we could get 3% on the <br />first year if we go with gap financing of the police station and then ratchet that up a quarter <br />every year thereafter. Short term money is going to be very inexpensive. Mr. Brett does not