My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/15/2009 Meeting Minutes
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2009
>
06/15/2009 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:27:23 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 6:13:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
6/15/2009
Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting Minutes <br />6-15-09 <br />Page 28 <br />Senator Grendell replied in our Bill, we actually require a water study if you are on non- <br />city water. A water study would be submitted with your application. In one version that we <br />have suggested, we have posed that we can't give you total power, that they would come to you. <br />When the permit application is made, it would be then sent to the community in the city or <br />village or township. They would have so many days to state their concerns and objections and <br />then ODNR would have to address those concerns before they could issue the permit. That may <br />be where we end up here. That seems to be the middle ground on what we are talking about. <br />Mayor Rinker asked, any kind of administrative review other than someone behind a desk behind <br />a closed door, like quasi-judicial proceedings like they do at liquor control? <br />Senator Grendell said, yes, it would be an appeal then. Let's say if the concerns were not <br />met, there could be an appeal to, he can't remember the technical name, it's the oil and gas part. <br />We also need to fix the membership on the gas board because it's all oil and gas people. We <br />need to make them a little bit of a fair appellate court. If we can't give you total control, we need <br />to give you meaningful input and some ability to appeal if that well is going to still be <br />obj ectionable. <br />One of the proposals back from ODNR, and this is a very fluid give and take negotiation <br />still going on with Senator Niehaus and ODNR, one of the suggestions was a suggestion that you <br />could state your objection and as long as you could pick where within the 20 acres the well could <br />go, as long as the well was allowed, you could pick where, you the local community could pick <br />where the 20 acres go. <br />This goes contrary to the ODNR statement that this has nothing to do about the fee <br />income. Senator Grendell will publicly tell you, he thinks this has a lot to do with their fee <br />income. When he sees 1388 wells get approved out of 1400, he does have a concern. Their <br />response is they don't care about to a degree local control as long as it doesn't limit the number <br />of wells that ultimately would be drilled. Ultimately you would be responsible for where the 20 <br />acres are that the well goes. That has been thrown back as a compromise. <br />Mayor Rinker said we have gone through that exercise. <br />Council President Buckholtz said it doesn't work well. <br />Senator Grendell said to him maybe in a certain neighborhood you don't want to have <br />any drills there. Mayor Rinker said that's what we found out. <br /> <br />Senator Grendell said you will be getting this. We are not quite finished yet, but when we <br />get it done, we will get you a comparison chart of the two Bills and a chance to weigh in over the <br />summer. We won't really get into this thick and heavy again until September is Senator <br />Grendell's guess.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.