Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council <br />Monday, November 7, 2016 <br />Page 3 <br />The request is to rezone to office-laboratory as approved by the electorate. There would be a <br />separate administrative due process where a use variance pursuant to Section 12 of the Charter <br />would be requested and if the use variance to allow for assisted living is granted, we would come <br />in with full plans that would be presented to the Planning Commission consistent with what is <br />going to be presented tonight. <br />I go back to the initial request made several years ago, by the same doctor, Dr. Moyal. There <br />were 3 stories. We were dealing with the Administration, Building Department and others, it was <br />reduced from 3 stories to 2 stories. There were originally 80 units back in around 2000 that we <br />requested. It is now 52 units. The square footage has been reduced from what was originally <br />submitted, 75,000 square feet to 45,000 square feet. It required a 100 foot setback by State law <br />from the gas well that is on the site. It sits right next to Fisher's Tavern and in front of the <br />University Hospital system medical building. It is also owned by the same property owner, Dr. <br />Moyal of the Georgian Medical Arts II, LLC. <br />The request itself, again, is to allow the electorate; it will require 5 votes of Council, to put on the <br />ballot sometime in 2017, whether it be February, May election, whatever Council will decide, to <br />allow the electorate, again based upon the referendum zoning requirement in the Charter to allow <br />the rezoning of the single-family use to the requested office-laboratory use consistent with the <br />zoning that exists on the other adjacent parcel owned by the same property owner. <br />If that is successful, at that point, under Charter, Section 12, a use variance may be requested to <br />allow the assisted living to be built consistent with the plans that are going to be discussed <br />tonight by Tim Mulle, Project Architect and there would be obviously full plans to be reviewed <br />by the Planning Commission so there would be significant administrative review. There would <br />be a Development Agreement entered into so that there is no question about what is going to be <br />built, what it is going to look like, and how it is going to interface with the existing medical <br />office building as well as the surrounding properties. <br />You will hear from Dr. Moyal. He has been in the community for a number of years. He has a <br />number of patients that live in Mayfield Village. He is a member of the community. We are <br />submitting plans to use as transparent as we possibly can so that level of comfort is as high as <br />possible. There are homes on 91. I am sure there are residents here. There has not been a new <br />single-family house built since at least 2000. It doesn't work. This site does not work for a <br />single-family home. No one is going to build asingle-family home on this site in front of a <br />medical office building and next to Fisher's Tavern. We are in a quandary. If the existing zoning <br />does not work, what zoning does? We are suggesting office-laboratory consistent with the use <br />owned by the same property owner, developed by the same property owner immediately behind <br />and again with assisted living which would have to be approved pursuant to a use variance which <br />the Charter has recently allowed. Hopefully I have explained what we are intending to do. <br />Council President Saponaro asked, is Dr. Moyal going to speak? <br />Mr. Fisher replied, at this point Mr. Mulle is going to make a presentation. <br />