Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council <br />Monday, July 15, 2013 <br />Page 3 <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, just refresh my memory. Was that a compliance issue or a <br />uniformity standardization? <br />Mr. Metzung replied, it started as a compliance issue. The signs needed to meet the new Code. <br />We had to meet the standards. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, so not every community is going to look the same, as long as <br />it follows the standards? <br />Mr. Metzung replied, correct. As long as they meet those standards. <br />Council President Buckholtz stated, okay. Very good. <br />COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKHOLTZ <br />There were no comments. <br />DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS: <br />SERVICE - Douizlas Metzun? <br />Mr. Metzung stated, as I don't see it as a Standing Committee anyrnore, Drainage and <br />Infrastructure met this evening and three projects were discussed. We will go forward with <br />getting some numbers together for Council to approve: <br />Mr. Marrie asked, are you still of the mind that you are not going to add the back up street signs <br />off the main streets, such as Sandalwood, Walnut, Butternut? <br />IVIr. Metzung replied, all streets will get signs. <br />Mr. Marrie stated, I am talking about the sign on SOM at the gateway. It's a main entrance. <br />Mr. Metzung replied, secondary signs. Correct. We will not have secondary signage for streets <br />that run off of other streets. <br />Mr. Marrie asked, why? <br />Mr. Metzung replied, I don't know. Aesthetically, it}s not attractive to have lists of signs with <br />names going up and down. They would not meet any kind of Code. Your signage would not be <br />attractive. <br />Mayor Rinker stated, let me interject. If you are talking about entryways, we have always <br />looked at it, if there's a neighborhood group that wants one.