My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/21/2012 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2012
>
05/21/2012 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:28:49 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 5:27:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
5/21/2012
Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council <br />Monday, May 21, 2012 <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2012-12, entitled, "A Resolution approving the adoption of the <br />Countywide All Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan for Cuyahoga County, 2011 Update." <br />Introduced by Mayor Rinker and Council as a Whole. <br />Mrs. Mills, seconded by Mrs. Cinco, made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2012-12. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked if there was any discussion. There was none. <br />ROLL CALL: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None Motion Carried <br />Resolution Adopted <br />' OTHER lYIATTERS : <br />Council President Buckholtz asked if there were any other matters. <br />Mrs. Mills reminded everyone about the Memorial Day Ceremony at Whitehaven Cemetery on <br />Sunday, May 27d`. Mr. Marrie will be speaking. <br />Mr. Marquardt stated, I have received some comments from residents at Aintree North relative to <br />the planned asphalt resurfacing of the streets. Their argument is that the concrete roadways are <br />what was paid for by the residents in their property valuations when they bought the lots. The <br />Village took on the responsibility of replacing or maintaining the same level of quality in the <br />streets. I think we should be aware that that argument is out there. We have done this in other <br />areas. There are people concerned about that. They feel that the Village is not living up to their <br />commitment to maintain the roadway in the same level of quality that was originally put in. <br />Going along with that, I would say that where we did that resurfacing on Hickory Hill some <br />years ago, it appears to me that it probably could use as little rejuvenation. We might want to be <br />looking at where we do this on the cycle time as far as rejuvenation. I know it's a less expensive <br />project than replacing concrete but we do need to take a look at it and make sure that it's kept up <br />to a high standard of quality. <br />Mr. Metzung replied, in that regard to the Hickory Hill and getting these projects more timely. <br />We would hope that we could start turning those around continuously every 10 years. As far as <br />applying a rejuvenator, we do do that. We did do that just a few years ago on Hickory Hill to <br />help maintain the surface. The hope is that we can get these roads in such a manner that we are <br />looking at 10-12 years where we are recycling through a11 these. Once you get through some of <br />the more major projects, the cost will come down some, not a lot, but it will come down some. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, didn't we buy equipment for that to be able to do that <br />ourselves?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.