My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/17/2003 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2003
>
11/17/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:29:30 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 6:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
11/17/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
11-17-03 <br />Regular Council Minutes <br />Page 10 <br />ROUGHDRAT'T -NOT REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY COUNCIL <br />determines what Rhodes Dahl proposes to us as far as how much money do they have to work with? <br />Sure, they will work something up and they will know that if we want to spend $10,000, this is what <br />you can do with $10,000 in that area versus if we want to spend $40,000. What is guiding them with <br />their development of this proposal? <br />s <br />___ ' <br />Council President Buckholtz said I want to correct one point of semantics. When you say that studies <br />can be expensive. This is really not a study as much as it is a diagram..... <br />Dr. Parker said no, no, no---what I meant was these kinds of things-I am not arguing the price of <br />these things, I know to do these things is expensive, I am just trying to figure out what is guiding <br />their end result. <br />Mayor Rinker said one; we already have built into the overall project some kind of baseline <br />landscaping. Typically, and I remember Tom Evans saying like for a particular property it maybe 3 <br />trees. It is pretty "chocolate and vanilla" kind of landscaping. I think that with Whitehaven there is a <br />good opportunity for us to see where we should be going with landscaping to take a typical format <br />that would work for the entire area. Whitehaven is a little bit unique because the impact on the <br />property, unlike most of the properties on the west side, has an additional component that you <br />typically don't have in the frontage takes. Typically you are just dealing with square footage, there <br />might be temporary taking (Costanzo is one; Rick Christian is another one. We have not resolved, <br />for example, Mr. Christian's frontage.) But with Whitehaven, because their house sits so close; in <br />effect the right-of--way comes right up literally to their front door, they are contending a second <br />issue-the argument is that there is damage to the remaining piece, the damage to the residue and <br />then the issues arises that the cost to cure whatever that damage is. We have not agreed that there is <br />damage to the residue but we are trying to figure out if there is a way that we can get the proverbial <br />win-win, where if we produce a plan for landscaping that is acceptable to them, and obviously <br />acceptable to us, it is something we can wrap into the negotiation or settlement of that particular <br />case. The other factor that is unique about Whitehaven, this is something we've been looking at from <br />early on is that while the right-of--way ends at a certain point, we are trying to extend the pathway <br />east of the right-of--way line. In other words, take advantage-and an even wider spacing from the <br />curb, the east curb and onto their property. That creates a totally different issue. We have not <br />acquired that property so what we are trying to do is get their permission and encourage them to <br />allow us to run the trail onto their property as opposed to everywhere else where the east side trail <br />runs within the right-of--way area. So we don't have a set number yet. That is part of the approach <br />here, is that if it looks something acceptable, then we're going to get an idea of how much it is going <br />to cost us. And then that's the decision that we have to make collectively. Is it worth spending "x" <br />amount of dollars? Do we want to spend "y" amount of dollars? What are we going to get for "x"? <br />What are we going to get for "y"? We just know that where the baseline is right now, it doesn't get <br />us a whole lot more than just kind of very prosaic landscaping which for some people may be <br />acceptable but I am suggesting that what we would want to do is something better than that. Bill <br />Ferinbach, who was formerly President of the Pattie Group which has very good experience in <br />landscaping, works with Rhodes Dahl now, has really great expertise. I think that what we'll get <br />from him is some good insight as far as to the kind of plant products to look for, techniques we can <br />take advantage of. I would anticipate, for example, with some of the dirt that we have all along the <br />right-of--way, we may be able to relocate dirt to provide mounding. The idea right now is to build a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.