02/17/2015 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL Mayfield Village Civic Hall Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - 8:00 p.m. The Council of Mayfield Village met in Regular Session on Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at Mayfield Village Civic Hall. Council President Buckholtz called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Mr. Buckholtz, Mr. Jerome, Mr. Marquardt, Mr. Marrie, Mrs. Mills and Mr. Saponaro Also Present: Mayor Rinker, Mr. Wyruie, Ms. Calta, Chief Edelman, Chief Carcioppolo, Mr. Marrelli, Mr. Metzung, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Cappello, Mr. DiNardo, Ms. Wolgamuth, Mr. Esborn and Mrs. Betsa Absent: Dr. Parker The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was given. OPEN PORTION - 3-minute limit imposed by Chair. .Those who wish to 'speak must first state their name and address. Brian Carr 1392 SOM Center Road Mayfield Heights, OH I am here representing Lynne Hamill and Tim Scasny. This is the item under Old Business, BZA Case No. 2014-04. I am sure that Council and the Mayor have looked at the Minutes of that meeting. It was ra.ther lengthy. I understand that the BZA denied the appeal that was filed. In a nutshell, I don't want to belabor the point because a lot of this was discussed in the evidence we believe support our position submitted to the BZA. To summarize, we had an issue with the September 8, 2014 letter but I am referring to it as a decision of the Building Commissioner regarding my client's property. Specifically, my clients reside at 648 Meadowood Drive. In the rear of the property, there is a structure. This was the matter that was in prior litigation. At the conclusion of that litigation, my clients then went forward to try to complete the construction on the inside of the structure. That goes back a little while. Fast forwarding to September 2014, my clients were attempting to obtain the final permits, specifically plumbing, gas and electrical, in order to complete the interior of the building. We have the September 8, 2014 letter from the Building Commissioner. Apparently what had occurred was a11 the permit applications my clients filled out were submitted to the Building Commissioner and in response is the aforementioned letter dated September 8, 2014 which I will say conditionally approves some of the permit applications but the issue that we have and the issue we brought to the Board of Zoning Appeals is referred to as a note. It's page 2 of the Building Commissioner's letter and it states, it's very short, it states under no circumstances sha11 the issuance of this permit or any other pernuts previously issued or