Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting Minutes <br />7-19-10 <br />Page 3 <br />Council President Buckholtz asked Ms. Calta to frame it just in terms of explaining that the <br />Charter Review came forth with some amendments and what our role is in that. <br />To summarize, Ms. Calta stated, it is administrative which means that your role is to place it on <br />the ballot for the electorate to make a decision on, not to make changes or have any discretion in <br />the process. It's administrative. That's what we found. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, that's just the ruling of case law that you were able to find? <br />Ms. Calta replied, to say that there's case law directly on point would be incorrect. There really <br />isn't anything directly on point but the case that we did find gave some guidance on what the rule <br />is in other circumstances. The Broadview Heights' case had to do with whether the procedures <br />on the emergency clause were followed appropriately. In that instance there was the same <br />procedure, the Charter Review Commission made recommendations and they. came to Council to <br />be placed on the ballot. They were going through their usual process of three readings and they <br />had an emergency clause in all of their ordinances certifying them to the Board of Elections. The <br />emergency clause did not pass. There weren't enough votes to pass it as an emergency. But, <br />there were enough votes to pass it. It was a 4-3 vote. There was a challenge to the validity of the <br />ordinance because the emergency clause didn't pass. In that instance, the Ohio Supreme Court <br />said, your role is administrative. You take what they give you. The language says that you pass <br />it on to the Board of Elections, straightforward. <br />Council President Buckholtz has always said it in the past. He will say it now and he will say it <br />again. The way we have always handled it is a vote "yes" is not in support of what the item is, <br />it's merely our responsibility, our duty to pass it on to the electorate. <br />Mayor Rinker replied, you're supporting the process without necessarily commenting on the <br />merits. <br />Council President Buckholtz agreed. However, having said that, at the last meeting there was <br />some interesting discussion. We talked about opening it up for public forum, having a public <br />hearing and encouraging people to come in and understand it and talk about it. It's his <br />understanding that we are still looking to go forward and do that. <br />Ms. Calta replied, that was one of Joe's recommendations. To air the issues with the public at a <br />public hearing and see what that fleshes out, knowing that Council can bring forward its own <br />amendments if you choose to do that. You can do that in an August meeting. If you have a public <br />hearing and something comes about, you can certainly go ahead and bring something forward at <br />the regular meeting in August. That would be ready to go to the Board of Elections by the <br />deadline in September. <br />Council President Buckholtz indicated that Mary Beth circulated some dates. It is his <br />understanding that there was one that everyone was good for except him because he was leaving <br />town. He may not be leaving town. He will know Thursday. We may be able to work that date