My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/08/2011 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2011
>
08/08/2011 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:09 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 7:56:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
8/8/2011
Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council <br />Monday, August 8, 2011 <br />Page 8 <br />dedicated greenspace was year-round opacity, that there would be screening. So whether it be both a <br />combination of fence and plantings or evergreens and that's one of the reasons we want the Village <br />to have control over the greenspace areas to make sure that opacity is patent. But that will be an issue <br />as a final site plan issue that would be addressed at the time construction pernuts would be issued. <br />John, I don't know if there's anything to add. <br />Mr. Marrelli stated, we spoke last week about this. We talked about the opacity and the fencing and <br />any kind of landscaping there. I made it clear, it is hard to imagine a 40 foot buffer when you're out <br />there walking around, so it's not real clear to people how big 40 feet of landscaping is. We talked <br />about that. I mentioned that if that's all filled in with landscaping, there's actually no way you can <br />see through there because if it's an evergreen screen and it's 40 feet wide, there would be no <br />visibility from the yard. <br />Mr. Marrelli continued, a good point that Mr. Pollack brought up was what about some mounding <br />along Wilson Mills. I was going to mention that to Randy. They have to dig some soil out to make <br />their detention area so maybe as a cost-savings you can take the soil out of the detention pond and <br />put it on the Wilson Mills side and then put the landscaping on that to give it a little more height. <br />Council President Pro Tem Marrie stated, you would have a natural buffer then. <br />Mr. Marrelli agreed. You will raise the level of the landscaping. <br />Mr. Pollack stated, it will actually save Deacon's money because the retention pool he is going to <br />have to excavate. If you put that soil on Wilson Mills you would actually assure that you are not <br />going to see the cars and it looks like parkland because you're raising the level of the topography and <br />it would actually save them from taking this dirt and dumping it. They could use that as a screening <br />on Wilson Mills. <br />Council President Pro Tem Marrie stated, as a natural buffer. <br />Mr. Marrelli stated, in other words, take the spoils out of the retention pond and put it along Wilson <br />Mills where the landscape is, just raise the landscaping a little bit because Wilson Mills starts to <br />descend and then that landscaping would pretty much cover all the trucks. <br />Mayor Riulcer added for Mr. Pollack's and everyone's benefit, not only Mr. Marrelli is here. We've <br />got Tom Cappello, who's our engineer. We've also got Ron Wynne, our Finance Director if you <br />have any questions about some of the economics as well. These are questions that are good for all of <br />us to note down. <br />Council President Pro Tem Marrie thanked Mr. Pollack. Good point. Anyone else? Any other <br />questions or comments? <br />Mrs. Mills asked, with this Development Agreement, and I'm sure this won't happen, if and when <br />the properiy was ever sold to another car dealership, would we have to reenter into another <br />Development Agreement?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.