Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of a Public Hearing <br />On Proposed Charter Review Revisions <br />8-10-10 <br />Page 11 <br />What this is saying is only the first ordinances are subject to a referendum of the <br />voters. Why is that? Well, if you don't like the idea of building a police station, <br />when this Council passed an ordinance to proceed with the building of the police <br />station, that was when the citizens should uprise, circulate their petitions and put <br />that on the ballot. If they don't do it, the next ordinances are going to be to <br />advertise for bids, to enter into contracts and to get multiple permits going from <br />the State, the EPA, all of which require ordinances. Once you enter into <br />contracts, once you authorize a contract, once you appropriate money, to do a <br />referendum on those subsequent ordinances would be illegal because you have <br />already committed to somebody to do something. <br />So, to have a referendum on only one aspect of a project for a capital <br />improvement makes no sense. It would be illegal. It would be entangled in legal <br />process. The Charter was adopted in the very beginning by the founding fathers <br />to limit the right of referendum to protect it on those types of issues. That's all <br />this amendxnent is doing, is clarifying that public improvements which have <br />multiple ordinances, you can only do referendum on the first ordinance on that. <br />That's what that one is all about. <br />That is all of the proposed amendments. This meeting is meant to discuss just those. <br />These are the ones that the Charter Review Commission has mandated to go on to the <br />ballot. They will go on the ballot. It's not a matter of us debating whether they should or <br />shouldn't, it's a matter of debating the merits of each of the ordinances and making a <br />decision at the voting booth in November when you have the opportunity to exercise your <br />right. <br />Council President Buckholtz thanked Mr. Diemert. He does not remember much of what <br />he learned in Civics in 6th grade, but he wishes Mr. Diemert was there to teach him this. <br />He is glad to have learned it tonight. <br />The audience applauded. <br />Public Portion of Hearing <br />Council President Buckholtz stated before we proceed, I would like to take a moment to explain <br />the process. We usually bring this up at all meetings, so it's nothing special for tonight. It's just <br />a reminder of a few issues of decorum. We ask each person that would like to speak to come up <br />to the podiutn and give their name and address so we can get it into the record. You will have 3- <br />5 minutes to speak. We would like to limit that so everybody gets a chance to be heard. One of <br />the things that we find often happens in these situations, if multiple people have the same point <br />of view, it would be nice if you could just stand up and be recognized. When someone makes a <br />comment you could raise your hand and stand up and say I would like to just add my name and <br />address to that comment. That way you are on the record as supporting that viewpoint without