My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/10/2010 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
08/10/2010 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:16 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 8:08:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
8/10/2010
Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Public Hearing <br />On Proposed Charter Review Revisions <br />8-10-10 <br />Page 3 <br />Cleveland, Cincinnati, Toledo, Sandusky, became very populated. The very populated people <br />working the factories were finding themselves working with Codes of the State of Ohio which <br />really didn't help them in the way of planning, building, living, child labor, and in the way of all <br />individual rights that the State of Ohio was trying to protect. <br />As a result, the citizens of Ohio circulated petitions and ended up having a Constitutional <br />Convention in 1912. In 1912, they amended the State of Ohio Constitution to allow individual <br />communities within the State to adopt their own Constitutions which is what we call our Charter. <br />It allowed the individual cities in geographically defined areas to do that for one reason, to try <br />and make living conditions on a local level adaptable on the basis of changes in conditions. So, <br />if you were in an individual area, people lived close together and they were very close to the <br />factories and had children working at 8 or 9 years old, they wanted the individual cities to be <br />able to control the zoning and have their own police powers in order to make life a livable place <br />in the industrial areas of the State. The rural folks felt they would like to control it the way they <br />wanted to control it so they could set up their own individual cities or villages. <br />After that amendment was adopted in 1912, the thing that you hear about most is Home Rule. So <br />all of the individual communities who wanted to have their own individual Constitution and <br />govern themselves exercised their right of Home Rule, put together a Charter Review <br />Commission and adopted a Charter. They defined their geography. They came up with a name. <br />They came up with a form of government. Either a strong Mayor, strong Council, City Manager, <br />several forms that were available to them. <br />Once they did that in the State of Ohio and Home Rule now was being exercised, first in the <br />major cities, you all have seen there are still townships left. Well what are townships? They are <br />leftover from before 1912. They are the leftovers who did not choose to have a charter. <br />Therefore they do not have anything other than Trustees governing them. They don't have a <br />Mayor. They don't have a Council. They may have their own police force but they still have to <br />follow State laws. They have no local codes or ordinances and they do not have a local charter. <br />Therefore, the changes in the Code do not go to the people to vote on when they amend their <br />charter because they don't have a charter. <br />That has worked pretty well. There have been a lot of Court actions on what is a Home Rule <br />right and what is not a Home Rule right. You have recently read in the paper about the residency <br />fight in the State of Ohio - can a community require its employees to live in that city? There <br />was a battle between the cities who want to do that and the State legislature who said that is not <br />fair, we are adopting a law that applies to everyone in this State. That's called a prevailing right, <br />when the government of the State of Ohio says we are exercising a State-wide right that has a <br />general protection involved in it and a general interest in it. What are some other examples of <br />that? Collective bargaining, minimum wage, Workers' Comp, sick leave, other things like those <br />kinds of general things the citizens in the State want to protect. <br />What does the Federal government have that no one can go against? Well, there's age <br />discrimination which the Federal government prohibits, there's religious discrimination, there's <br />race discrimination, there's First Amendment rights. The Federal government has adopted a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.