Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of a Public Hearing <br />On Proposed Charter Review Revisions <br />8-10-10 <br />Page 30 <br />Dr. Parker replied, that's what I'm trying to clarify. <br />Mr. Diemert stated, that's not an issue. <br />Dr. Parker stated, okay. Thank you. <br />Mayor Rinker stated, if I can, I would just like to make an observation. I do take to heart the <br />comment that we don't provide the Minutes on the web because it's something that is important. <br />Where we have failed in that I certainly want to make sure we correct it. <br />But the other part is, we really have been trying to improve the lines of communication. We have <br />revamped our website. It took a while. It cost some money to do that, but in fact we did put on <br />our homepage, we've got a mechanism that is designed to advise people of current meetings that <br />are upcoming. We used the website to advertise this meeting. We did not advertise it in the VOV, <br />but we did get into the VOV discussion about the fact that there were these Charter proposals <br />forthcoming and we certainly will put into the mail the specific legislation that is proposed <br />because we're supposed to do that by law. I know we did use the marquee to identify this <br />meeting and we did send out mailings to everyone advising them of the meeting. <br />The meeting itself that we're having tonight is not something that is specified in the Charter. <br />Part of the discussion at the Council meetings after the Commission made its recommendations <br />was to have a public hearing like this and so we did advertise it. Obviously bad news travels <br />faster than good news. I have a feeling that a lot of people who got the notice didn't really pay <br />much attention to it. On the other hand, those that did get the more provocative notice -, so <br />maybe we should be changing our methodology. But in all candor, it is very important that you <br />get information. We've been trying to use different methodologies. We know we have to make <br />improvements with the website. It's an ongoing process. The most blatant one to me is that <br />we've got to get Minutes out in a timely fashion. <br />All meetings are public, committee meetings, commission meetings, board meetings. There are <br />very few people that have the time much less the inclination to come, so we don't use that as an <br />excuse. We thought a public hearing would be a more effective way, at least to get people aware <br />well in advance of November that these are items that under our Charter have to be reviewed by <br />the public. <br />So again, we take to heart the fact that, and you have a legitimate requirement of your public <br />officials to make these things public. We're working on it. We try to improve it. Clearly we can <br />make more improvements but I want you to know that it's not for lack of effort and we do <br />encourage this kind of discussion. We don't get this at every meeting, but I'm really heartened <br />by the fact that a lot of people did show up. To me this is the way our democratic process is ¦ <br />supposed to work. So I thank you for coming. <br />The audience applauded. m