My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/16/2010 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
08/16/2010 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:18 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 8:09:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
8/16/2010
Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting Minutes <br />8-16-10 <br />Page 10 <br />Mrs. Triner replied, that's great. That's good to know. I don't know if Linda wanted to clarify when <br />she mentioned some outrageous amendments. I'm not sure she meant all of them. There's some very <br />good ones, as Phil Stella mentioned last week about the change of the language, the he-she stuff. <br />I have a sense that, first of all, I appreciated the Marquardt/Parker amendments because I think that <br />that stimulated some discussion. Not that I heard from Bill or Steve on that, but it got things out <br />more in the open and so I think that was very helpful for them to have that amendment. I thuik some <br />of the other ones seem to us maybe to be rushed, or that we were not informed because not having <br />some of the Council meetings and Caucus meetings posted. <br />I just wanted to ask, kind of a related question. I am under the impression there's an awful lot of <br />Mayfield Village-owned property including that 15 acres that I guess Progressive was going to use, <br />thought about using on SOM north of Wilson Mills. There's a huge amount that the Village owns <br />there that we have bought a lot of houses and I'm not sure where to find information about what we <br />own, what's going to be done. I know there's a 2003 2020 Plan, but I'm not sure if that's totally up <br />to date or if the updates are there. We are just not clear on what the Village has planned for all of the <br />land or how much land we really own. I can't speak to that. <br />Going in reverse order, Mayor Rinker stated I'm not sure why you wouldn't know how much we've <br />owned because we've published that. It was in the VOV two issues ago where it talked about the <br />tota.l number of acreage. There was a full sheet. <br />Mrs. Triner stated, that's good, we are all so busy, working or - <br />Mayor Rinker stated, with all due respect, I have heard that line probably one time too many. You're <br />talking to the wrong person about being busy. But I appreciate the fact that not everybody is going to <br />be able to look at records. Historically, as a community we've kept record of just about everything <br />we do. By law we have to. We have always tried to make it clear to folks that if they contact us we <br />can copy that. I know that Mrs. Betsa's done that over the years. We all have done that. <br />Mrs. Triner replied, she's great. <br />Mayor Rinker stated, well, good, I'm glad you agree because they've always been diligent. I think <br />last time I took to heart because it was a legitimate concern that we didn't have Minutes posted. We <br />really did try to rectify that as best we could. We are getting better in terms of what we can make <br />available on the web. On the other hand we have a lot of feedback from people that say they don't <br />use the computer, they're not computer literate, so we do have a lot of different ways that we've tried <br />to make it available. I thinlc a lot of times people just don't particularly know. We don't try to <br />discourage it. It's just a lot of times the day-to-day stuff just escapes a lot of us. <br />I understand that when people say they're busy, that I fully understand and we appreciate it. But we <br />have tried over the years to show people that the lands that the Village has acquired has been to <br />aggregate for park purposes. A lot of it is for infrastructure, stormwater areas, streams, for example, <br />the Parlcledge property that is north of Fisher's Tavern. That was the properly that was rezoned that <br />was a referendum issue. It had gone through a pretty long process for about two years beiween
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.