Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting Minutes <br />8-16-10 <br />Page 12 <br />Mayor Rinker replied, the one plan that we do have is we've had discussions with the County <br />Library and we've indicated to them that if they want to relocate there because they've been looking <br />at a new site for quite some time, that they would be able to do that on the front portion of that <br />property. We probably still have to resolve the Development Agreement we originally had with <br />Progressive vis-a-vis that potential. But that's still in the early stages. We're not exactly sure what <br />the ending lot split would be for that and when that process goes through there would be a full <br />disclosure with a Development Agreement. Council ultimately would have to make decisions about <br />how a lot split and consolidation would take place. <br />Mrs. Triner replied, everybody that I talked to about this whole topic says your plan is to do the <br />greenspace and your plan is to keep it a residential area and not turn it into a Solon or to a Mayfield <br />Heights. They love it. I think Ray Koren made the point at the Town Hall meeting - <br />Mayor Rinker stated, let me interject, it's not where we're going to do it. That's what we've been <br />doing and we intend to do that. <br />Mrs. Triner replied, okay, great. Thanks. <br />Mayor Rinker added, that's the whole greenway concept. <br />Mrs. Triner replied, I think the point that Ray Koren made or somebody made at the Town Ha11 <br />meeting was maybe this Council is so conscientious about trying to retain the residential greenspace. <br />If we vote for this, a couple of things are so disturbing to us, we vote for those and it's a different <br />Council, we've given up our say on this. They may not share the same vision that you share. So <br />that's why we're so concerned and so opposed to these. <br />Mayor Rinker replied, we understand that. Again, that's why as we answered last week, it was the <br />reason we scheduled the public hearing because we felt that the earlier people are aware from the <br />point that it was announced officially from the Coirunission that this would be something the voters <br />would need to address and we fully expect that. You mentioned the other night whether or not if you <br />got a petition if we would be able to advertise that in some way and I said within certain reason <br />depending on how the verbiage is of that because we want to be careful. We certainly will publish <br />that. We try to be the forum. We hy to be a means of communicating that and obviously the whole <br />idea of a referendum is it gives people an opportiuuty to act on a matter of municipal importance. <br />They get their vote and they get to talk about it leading up to the vote. <br />Mrs. Triner replied, that's great. The person who asked about the petition, I'm not sure exactly what <br />they had in mind. It sounds like if they wanted to pursue it, they would probably want to check the <br />wording with you beforehand to make sure it would be something you can publish. <br />Mayor Rinker replied, it would make sense from a standpoint that. we would probably defer to the <br />Law Director as far as the content, the way it's phrased more or less, more style than a.nykhing else. <br />But substantively understand that that's something and if people take the time and they go out and <br />they petition, not only would we want to be able to publish that, we would want to encourage people.