My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/06/2010 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
10/06/2010 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:21 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 8:10:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
10/6/2010
Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Public Hearing <br />October 6, 2010 <br />Page 10 <br />The second thing, and it's especially true at the State level. Referendum really became popular <br />during the progressive era because government in the United States was very corrupt. We still <br />have parts of that. Cuyahoga County is an excellent example of corrupt government. Counties for <br />some reason in Ohio, people don't reform them. It takes an extraordinary effort. Cities have <br />been reformed, but counties have been extraordinarily hard to reform in Ohio. <br />To counter the corruption, the progressives wanted referendum so that the people could speak on <br />issues rather than have corrupt governments deal with them. Absent corruption, referendum like <br />I said to me raised a lot of issues about deliberation. It's hard to use an election to deliberate. At <br />the State level, more and more of these campaigns are being financed by out-of-state interests. . <br />This is a real concern I've got. They are not only not a deliberative process, you've got people <br />funding these from outside of Ohio. The really effective ads that give Strickland, where these <br />people talk in their office about how he hasn't done anything, they are not made in Ohio or <br />financed in Ohio. They are from outside the State. I watched the soda pop manufacturers which <br />are not my manufacturers; my wife and I have lost 120 pounds in the last 10 months, we gave up <br />soda pop; but the soda pop manufacturers used the ability of referendums in Ohio to take off the <br />tax on them. Well, if we want public services and they aren't going to pay taxes, who's going to <br />pay them? We are going to make up the difference. The referendum to me have a lot of issues <br />around whether a community can really deliberate about the issue or not rather than hold the <br />representatives accountable for how they deal with the issue. <br />The second thing, when Lakewood went back to getting rid of the referendum on the water <br />which is similar to what was talked about as the reasons for modifying, not totally eliminating <br />but modifying, the referendum here on zoning is that Lakewood has a 100 year old sewer system. <br />Your water rates finance your sewers. Lakewood has its own sewers. We don't belong to a <br />regional sewer district. We have our own sewage processing plant which has to be upgraded in <br />the future. The sewers are, thankfully they were built to be separated sewers which means the <br />wastewater is different than the storniwater. Cleveland has joint sewers, one sewer that carries <br />both. That's why you can't swim in Lake Erie after a storm in Cleveland because all of the <br />sanitary waste gets dumped into the lake. Well those sewers were breaking down like I said. <br />The only way to finance the repair of those sewers is to raise water rates and the estimate was <br />that water rates in Lakewood will probably double every five years. In part because the water <br />system itself is now 100 years old. <br />This countty is faced with a major problem in infrastructure like that gas explosion in California. <br />Well I'm in a house sitting on top of probably a 100 year old sewer, my house was built in 1914 <br />and the water mains are probably that age also. So, we looked at the Charter Review <br />Commission, we said, Lakewood's got to address those issues. If we're going to remain a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.