Laserfiche WebLink
PRD Meeting <br />11-25-02 <br />Page 26 <br />Council President Buckholtz, Mr. Samac and several others said no. <br />Mr. Marrotte said so what you are saying is one of the people under the "family" has to be the <br />owner? <br />Mr. Marne said that's what it says earlier. It has to be owner occupied. Now if he decides to <br />have 2 renters with him or college students, he can do it. The owner is still there. <br />Mr. Marrotte said no you can't rent. <br />Mrs. Cinco said as long as the owner is there. <br />Mr. Marrotte said if all that's living with him--if the owner is in the house, he can have 2 other <br />people with him. <br />Mr. Marrotte said yes but he can't rent rooms. It says non-profit. <br />Dr. Parker said is that what you want to restrict? <br />Mr. Marne said yes, yes. <br />Dr. Parker said I am just saying, that's another example of where you can easily have your <br />children's family living in there, your son and daughter-in-law and their child even though <br />you've been put into a nursing home. I mean that person has to sell that unit in order to let <br />someone of his family use it even though he is not occupying it? I'm not saying it's right or <br />wrong, I'm just bringing up a "for example." <br />Mr. Marne said it says owner occupied so it means owner occupied. So that covers the whole <br />ballgame to me. <br />Dr. Parker said that's fine. I'm just bringing up an example of where the owner could be a <br />parent that's put into a nursing home--- <br />Mr. Marrie said they're not occupying the home so they can't do it unless it's owner occupied. <br />Dr. Parker said so that means those people can't live in there? <br />Mr. Marrie said no. Not if the owner isn't there; that's why you have owner occupied. <br />Mayor Rinker said I think realistically you always have enforcement issues. Because the home <br />owner -when you buy a unit, you buy into the home owner's agreement so contractually you're <br />obligated to be an occupant; you must occupy. Does that preclude people from trying to sidestep <br />it--in and of itself, no. But the intent is that that's what you are saying. And then it becomes a <br />question of enforcement and it's either through the municipality or through the homeowners' <br />association itself. One of the considerations is that maybe some of these assessment issues, I <br />know that some communities try to tie into whatever a homeowner's group has on some of these <br />