My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/23/2017 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2017
>
01/23/2017 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:31:52 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 10:10:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
1/23/2017
Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Nlinutes of the Regular Meeting of.Council <br />Monday; January 23, 2017 <br />Page 4 witli the new Mayor about wliether she had healthcare. The same Council President is the one <br />that has imposed a 3-minute limit to residents wishing to express their opiniori on Village issues. <br />It is really for the good of the people that elected him. Is this really? I don't think not.' Although <br />I must say the past President and Council did the right thing by putting it to the residents when <br />they wanted a raise. That was a proper way to do something for compensation. This President <br />seeks to go around the residents to give himself full-time healthcare that is not in the best interest <br />of the residents. I don't think he is thinking of anyone other than himself and other people that <br />are involved here. There are at least. 3 self-employed Council members that would benefit <br />personally from this change. However, this is not the: reason that they were elected. They were <br />elected to serve the community, not themselves. After the last Caucus meeting, I asked one of <br />the Council people why they would do this. Sadly, his answer to me was, well it's just small <br />potatoes. . <br />Lastly, is this really for the best interests of the residents or is it for the best interests of Council? <br />Please reconsider your actions and withdraw any illegal ordinance or anything relating to full- <br />time healthcare for you Council members. This whole healthcare issue is part-time Council <br />members. Most of the people in this Village pay for their own healthcare and they work fu11- <br />time. You better start representing the residents here and stop looking out for just yourselves. <br />Thank you. <br />Susan Conte <br />833 Beech Hill Road <br />I agree with my brother-in-law wholeheartedly. Tlus is wrong. <br /> <br />1090 Washington Boulevard Extension <br />I want to make it clear that there was never anything said that the Mayor initiated this. I have <br />lived in the Village for 40 years. I am very disappointed. Yes, I have heard several comments <br />that people don't come to these meetings, but look around. They are here. Because you know <br />what? We put our trust in you and for you guys to try to slide it through, it's very upsetting. <br />Yes, we are very upset. Thank you for your time. <br />Dino Marino <br />6807 Bramblewood <br />I have lived there for about 49 years. Who initiated this? Who is the initiator? Please answer <br />the question. <br />Council President Saponaro replied, this was initiated or part of a discussion that has been <br />ongoing. <br />Mr. Marino stated, that was not the question. The question is, who is the Councilperson that <br />initiated this idea? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.