Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council <br />Monday, August 15, 2022 <br />Page 3 <br />Council President Schutt stated, thank you Mayor Bodnar. <br />Comments From Council President Schutt <br />I have a couple of things as well. I just wanted to remind everyone that this Saturday, August <br />201h is the Annual Village Celebration from 1:00-10:30 p.m. at the Parkview Pool and Grove. <br />Special thanks ahead of time to our Parks and Recreation Department, Service Department, <br />Police and Fire Departments. I know you will have your hands full that day. Hopefully there are <br />no emergencies. Thank you in advance for all of your work with that. <br />I also wanted to mention that the Mayor and I are issuing a Commendation to a 5th grade student <br />at Center Elementary School for her efforts in keeping Mayfield Village beautiful by keeping the <br />Bruce G. Rinker Greenway Trail free of litter. <br />I also wanted to mention that due to the Labor Day holiday, the September Caucus meeting will <br />be held on Tuesday, September 6, 2022. The next Regular Meeting of Council is scheduled for <br />September 19, 2022. <br />Open Portion — For Public Comment (5 -minute limit) <br />Council President Schutt stated, the floor will be opened for purposes of discussing the appeal of <br />the BZA decision. Following that, the floor will be opened for any other public comment. <br />Appeal of Board of Zoning Appeals' Decision in Case No. 2022-05, dated July 19, 2022. <br />Danuta & Stefan Waradzyn, 6920 Wilson Mills Road (Denial of Variance for Fence <br />Height) <br />James Sofianos <br />Hello everyone. I represent Stefan and Danuta Waradzyn. Their address is 6920 Wilson Mills <br />Road. They are attempting to get a variance for a fence that they are trying to put around the <br />property. They recently built a house on 6920 Wilson Mills Road. They are requesting a V <br />height difference in the fence that they want across their property strictly for safety reasoning. <br />That initial appeal was denied, so that's what we are here for today. <br />The primary concern is the overall safety with a fence. The city allows a 4' fence. In terms of <br />what they are looking for a 5' foot fence is again, their primary safety concerns. Their main <br />safety concern is at this point they do dog sit and they want to get a larger dog. Larger dogs can <br />hop over a 4' fence and as you guys know, other neighbor's dogs get aggressive sometimes. <br />They had an issue prior with a dog that lived at their residence. It hopped over their 4' fence at <br />their previous address so that's why they are attempting to get this variance for a 5' fence. The <br />C; dog did cause some damage to their dog at the time. That dog was a larger dog and was able to <br />