Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council <br />Monday, August 15, 2022 <br />Page 7 <br />Council President Schutt asked, are there any other questions from Council to Ms. Calta? <br />There were none. <br />Olga Mechanis <br />I am the daughter of Danuta and Stefan. One of the things that you mentioned is that it has to be <br />a difficulty. I am not sure if anybody is aware of the property. It is not a flat property. It does <br />have a little bit of differences in height. One of the neighbors are lower and the other is higher <br />so the fence would be different on one side versus the other so having a 5' fence would actually <br />get more even than having the same amount if an animal would decide to jump over if the <br />property is higher on the neighbor's side then it would be easier to jump over versus lower. <br />Dogs can jump over a 4' fence but a 5' fence is much harder for anybody to jump over. My <br />parents did have an issue with a dog actually coming over into my parents' property when they <br />were dog -sitting. Who is to say that another neighbor is going to get another dog that decides to <br />jump over? That would be a difficulty for them since the property has one side higher than the <br />other. Also, it is easier for any human to just jump over the fence versus a 5' fence and you are <br />able to see for safety reasons everything that's going around you so that if there's anything going <br />wrong with your neighbor or they get hurt, you can easily see that they need help and you can <br />jump over and help versus not knowing what's going on. Thank you. <br />Council President Schutt asked, are there any other public comments on this issue? <br />Mrs. Jurcisek stated, I do have one follow up question. In the Board of Zoning Minutes and this <br />evening, it was mentioned that there was potentially a pool? Was a permit pulled for a pool yet <br />on that property? <br />Mr. Russell replied, no there has not been. <br />Mrs. Jurcisek replied, okay. Thank you. <br />James Sofianos <br />I may have misunderstood you so I apologize for coming up here for nothing, but you had <br />mentioned that it was not appealing to the eye, a wood fence as opposed to a chain link fence. Is <br />that part of the reasoning for the Code? Is that what you were pertaining to? <br />Ms. Calta replied, within the context of the Code, typically chain link fences are not looked at as <br />being aesthetically pleasing the same way that a wooden fence would. We were talking about <br />discrepancies between allowing a board -on -board versus a chain link. They are looked at in the <br />Code completely differently and that's pretty typical across all sorts of fence codes. <br />