09/02/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS SEPTEMBER 2, 1987 PAGE 4 ? existing rental storage building that now exists on the eastern end of Lorain Road. Even though such a storage facility is not a specific permitted use, it is in essence a retail use. Mr. Grace stated that he believes that such a facility should be in the Limited Industrial area. Mr. Gareau stated,that the ultimate consumer is the general public, as opposed to the storage as described in the Industrial area which is bulk or wholesale. The neighbors have no objections to the proposal and do not believe that it will take away from their privacy. Mr. Bugala and Mr. Grace are both concerned that there will be outdoor storage on the site. Mr. Geiger advised that there would be no -o.utdoor storage. He further advised that the request for a variance to have a.-skylight instead of a window has been withdrawn from the agenda and presented revised nlans reflecting that. Mr. Bugala also stated that he believes that there might be a problem with people storing illegal or stolen goods at this facility. Mr. Geiger stated that this would be handled with a seareh warrant in the same manner as if these good were stored on nrivate property. C. Remmel moved that the Board rules that this request should be consider in the General Retail District, seconded by B. Grace. Roll call on motion: Remmel, Grace, Bugala, and Gomersall, yes.. Mr. Helon, no. Motion carried. 9. Margaret Zuharancik lot split and assembly plat (A. Kanareff)$-131276 Lorain Rd. Request for yariance (.1133.13). Request variance to subdivide permanent parcel 234-03-006 into 2 parcels (oarcel 1 and parcel 2) ; parcel 1(containing house) to be assembled to permanent parcel 234-03-007 and requires a 111.1 foot variance for frontage of lot in Industrial area and a 175 square foot variance for area of lot (1 acre required). Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1195.04. Also, request variance for.uarcel 2 for no frontage on street (parcel 2 is being assembled to permanent parcel 234-03-013). Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1000.01 (a). Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Kanareff, owner, who explained that they are spTitting off the portion of the parcel beyound the C.E.I. easement and_ attaching it to an adjacent parcel in order to hold that land for future development (there is no frontage on a street for that parcel). Combining this nroperty with adjacent property (which has frontage) is being discussed with Mr. Varga, the owner of that parcel. Mr. Kanareff stated that he will agree that no structures will be built until there is frontage for the parcel. In refer- ence to parcel 1, he advised that the house is built over the property line and these two lots must be assembled as required b_y the Planning Commission. Law Director Gareau stated that there has been problems with develoning some of this land because the lots are bowling alley t_ype lots. The Planriing Commission had recommended granting the variances with the conditiori that parcel 2 will be assembled prior to being developed. R. Bugala moved to grant the variance to subdivide permanent parcel 234-03-006 into 2 parcels (parcel 1 and parcel 2), parcel 1(containing house) to be assembled to per- manent parcel 234-03-07 and to grant the 111.1 foot variance for the frontage of the lot in the Industrial area and to grant a 175 square foot variance for the area of the lot (1 acre required), seconded by C. Remmel, and unanimously approved. R. Bugala moved to grant a variance for parcel number 2 for no frontage on a street (parcel 2 is being assembled to permanent parcel 234- 03-013), seconded by C. Remmel, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 10. Hampton Inn Cleveland Airport (North Coast Inns), 25105 Country Club Blvd. Req_uest was withdrawn by the developer nrevious to meeting.