My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/1988 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1988
>
1988 Architectural Review Board
>
02/17/1988 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:16 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 4:04:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1988
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/17/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW FEBRUARY 17, 1988 PAGE 2 <br />same stucco as the building instead of their being painted to match the <br />b uilding especially since they are visible from the recreation center <br />drive. After further review of the site plan he suggested that in order <br />to save some of the mature trees on the property some parking spaces <br />could be rearranged by putting a row of parking adjacent to the building <br />and others could be landbanked. Mr. Richards will discuss this with the <br />forester. Regarding the signage, a f_ifty square foot pole sign is planned, <br />and signage is to be installed on the building and the awning over the <br />entrance. The total sign area could be over what is allauied and-m'ight also <br />require a variance, this must be determined by the Building Commissioner. <br />Mr. Pattison pointed out that there is far less signage proposed than <br />what is now on the existing building. D. Pattison moved to approve this <br />submission with the following stipulations: that the portion which calls <br />for prefinished freezers and coolers coming out the rear of the b uilding <br />be, in fact, finished with stucco and/or painted wood consistant with <br />the remainder of the building,recognizing that the project has provided <br />very admirably for screening of the mechanical units on the roof and <br />the landscaping of the project;and we would recommend that Planning <br />Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals who wi11 be hearing this con- <br />sider the landbankinc, of parking spaces which could save certain mature <br />trees on this site, moreover, in addition to that, the signing as shown <br />to this Board is acceptable for style but the actual size of the signage <br />will be left to review by Mr. Conway; and should any of the Boards so <br />desire, we would have no hesitancy to allow the first plan to go through, <br />but it would be our recommendation to support the granting of variances <br />to eliminate the second driveway as well as to eliminate the parking in <br />front of the building, seconded by B. Zergott, and unanimously approved. <br />VI. ADJOURNMENT: <br />The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m. <br />D. Pattison, Acting Chairman B. Oring, Clerk of Commissions
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.