10/24/1989 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. P'?..•- PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 24, 1989 PAGE 6 to do the best planning job possible. Mr. Franz agreed that they could determine the most probable outcome of the development, but does not want the approval of this project held up_because of their concept plans. After some discussion it was agreed that the office complex should be presented on a master plan basis and a traffic study for the entire com- plex be, conducted by a traffic consultant who would be agreed to,by the city. Mr. Gorris continued with his motion. This proposal represents the development of parcel B of a larger tract of land consisting of parcels A, B, C, and D. At the next meeting Developers Diversified will present a conceptual layout of the planned development of the complete tract including parcels C, D, and A showing how this layout dovetails with the proposed develapment of parcel B. The conceptual layout will indicate planned curb cuts and will be accompanied by the traffic study as stipulated under item 7 of the judgement entry relating to the devel- opment of this land. Seconded by T. Morgan and unanimously approved. Chairman Thomas advised the Atrium Developers that they would have to confer with Developers Diversified regarding participating in the traffic study. He furtlier stated that they would be notified of the exact date of the next Architectural Review Board meeting. IV. NEW DEVELOPPIENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Bruscino Homes Assembly Plat (proposal was added to the agenda) Heard with the building plans item 1, Building Department Requests. V. COMNIUNICATIONS: No items. VI. COM14ITTEE REPORTS: (heard later in meeting) VII. NE?d BUSINESS: No items. VIII. OLD BUSINESS: Ord. 89-90: An Ordinance Creating New Sections 1101.10(e) of the North Olmsted Subdivision Ordinance and 1119.02(d) of the North Olmsted Zoning Code Providing for Notification to Land Owners of Existing Restrictive Covenant Deeds and Requiring that Buildings, Alterations, and Additions be Constructed in Accordance with such Properly Executed and Recorded Restrictive Covenant Deeds. Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised that some residents in Pebblebrook Subdivision believed that the homes were not be constructed according to the restrictive convenants. Some of the Council members believed that the city should enforce private restrictive covenants as well as enforcing the Zoning Code. He explained that when a subdivision plat was presented to the city these restrictions would be included. Members expressed concern because the Building Department would have to enforce these covenants, not only when a new home was being built, but later on when issuing permits for any other type of construction. It was agreed that the city should not have to be the enforcer of private restrictions. Mr. Thomas stated that he would like to see this type of legislation for the commercial area. i•1r. Cesen stated that from a practical standpoint the city does not have the people to do the work. B. Gorris moved to approve the proposed Gity of No'rth Ordinance 89-80 as presented,.seconded by T. Morgan. Roll.call on motion: Gorris,